W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:16:39 +0000
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1269285400.8745.42.camel@ophelia2.g5n.co.uk>
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 06:38 -0400, Ivan Herman wrote:
> - regardless of the difficulty of implementation, I myself regard
> RDFa, from the SW point of view, as yet another standard serialization
> of RDF. But, with an RDFS processing in the picture, that is not true
> any more. This is a major step to take...

It's not really my intention to suggest that RDFS inferencing should be
built into RDFa parsers.

Rather a RDFa parser would produce a graph containing the uninferenced
triples, which could then be handed over to an inferencer by the
consumer (and this is the important bit...) if the consumer wants to.

RDFa would remain a standard serialisation of RDF.

Toby A Inkster
Received on Monday, 22 March 2010 19:17:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:17 UTC