- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:16:39 +0000
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 06:38 -0400, Ivan Herman wrote: > - regardless of the difficulty of implementation, I myself regard > RDFa, from the SW point of view, as yet another standard serialization > of RDF. But, with an RDFS processing in the picture, that is not true > any more. This is a major step to take... It's not really my intention to suggest that RDFS inferencing should be built into RDFa parsers. Rather a RDFa parser would produce a graph containing the uninferenced triples, which could then be handed over to an inferencer by the consumer (and this is the important bit...) if the consumer wants to. RDFa would remain a standard serialisation of RDF. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Monday, 22 March 2010 19:17:21 UTC