- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:07:24 -0400
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 20 March 2010 10:06:32 UTC
But then we are discussing three proposals, aren't we? In your mail you referred to two, but On 2010-3-19 21:31 , Manu Sporny wrote: [skip] > > * RDFa vocabulary proposal (Ivan/Manu) > * @token proposal (Mark) > * Default prefix proposal (Toby/Martin) > In view of the other mail I now understand (sorry, I think I understand:-) that what you call vocabulary and @token proposals *are* different in a fairly fundamental way, namely the context dependency of the interpretation of certain RDFa attributes. And I agree that what you call the default prefix proposal is distinctly different. So we have three and not two (sigh...) Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF : http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf vCard : http://www.ivan-herman.net/HermanIvan.vcf
Received on Saturday, 20 March 2010 10:06:32 UTC