- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:09:40 -0400
- To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
- CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
A few minor points of clarification on which documents that RDFa WG is responsible for publishing. Some thought that I was implying that the RDFa WG would be generating all of the "thin" specifications below. The only two documents in the list below that the RDFa WG is chartered to create are RDFa Core 1.1 and XHTML+RDFa. On 03/28/10 16:38, Manu Sporny wrote: > We're going for a spec hierarchy that looks like this, with all of the > XYZ+RDFa specs being very "thin" documents that layer on top of RDFa > Core 1.1: > > +--------- HTML+RDFa > +--------- SVG+RDFa > RDFa Core 1.1 ----+--------- EPUB+RDFa > +--------- ODF+RDFa > +--------- XHTML+RDFa Additionally, RDFa has not yet been accepted as EPUB's metadata expression mechanism, but it's in the running. It was mentioned as another example of possible language integration for RDFa. It is understood that all other documents should be created and controlled by their respective Working Groups. To be very specific: RDFa Core 1.1 - created and published by RDFa WG @ W3C HTML+RDFa - created and published by HTML WG @ W3C SVG+RDFa - created and published by SVG WG @ W3C EPUB+RDFa - possibly created and published by EPUB WG @ IDPF ODF+RDFa - created and published by ODF TC @ Oasis XHTML+RDFa - created and published by RDFa WG @ W3C -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: PaySwarming Goes Open Source http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2010/02/01/bitmunk-payswarming/
Received on Monday, 29 March 2010 15:10:11 UTC