- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:36:57 +0000
- To: Stephane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 16:30 -0500, Stephane Corlosquet wrote: > I gave a quick glance at the open issues [1] but I could not find any > on this topic, or this handled as part of another issue? As I see it there are two related questions: 1. Given a node that has no datatype attribute and non-textnode content, such as: <span property="ex:foobar">Albert <b>Einstein</b></span> Should RDFa 1.1 generate an XMLLiteral (like RDFa 1.0 does), or generate a plain literal (like most people seem to prefer)? 2. When an XMLLiteral is generated, in RDFa 1.0 descendant elements are skipped for parsing. In RDFa 1.1, should we require descendant elements to be parsed, should we keep the RDFa 1.0 behaviour, or should we provide a mechanism for page authors to decide? -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Friday, 12 March 2010 09:37:37 UTC