- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 09:16:25 +0000
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Hi Ivan, > @profile was used but on the side, so to say, and as an optional feature > that did not really influence RDFa processing. We would suddenly pick it > up make it an essential feature of RDFa 1.1 just when the HTML WG > decides to drop it... And we would give it a special semantics, although > many people would believe this is the same old @profile and would use it > for different things... Quick thing...I've really tried *not* to give @profile "special semantics". In my blog-post I tried to stress the idea of the profile URI being a key, which is consistent with the HTML 4.01 definition. The discussion we're having about what that key can be used for is of course RDFa-specific, but at that point we're into processing not syntax. Regards, Mark -- Mark Birbeck, webBackplane mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number 05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street, London, EC2A 4RR)
Received on Sunday, 7 March 2010 09:17:02 UTC