www-tag@w3.org from February 2002 by author

Art.Barstow@nokia.com

• RE: Issue request for the TAG: XForms (Monday, 4 February)

Bill de hÓra

• RE: [nsMediaType-3] Principles and corner cases (Monday, 4 February)

Brian McBride

• Issue for the tag? (Friday, 15 February)

Chris Lilley

• Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be enco uraged...) (Sunday, 24 February)

Dan Connolly

• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Monday, 18 February)
• PROPFIND disconnected from GET space? [whenToUseGet-7] (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Tuesday, 12 February)
• "charset" is not generic to all media types [nsMediaType-3] (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: Slight architectural discrepancy between XMl 1.0 & the infoset (Saturday, 2 February)

Daniel Dardailler

• Issue for the TAG (Thursday, 14 February)

David Fallside

• RE: Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs (Tuesday, 12 February)

David Orchard

• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Monday, 18 February)
• Draft TAG response to as yet unnumbered Rick Jelliffe issue (Wednesday, 13 February)
• RE: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 7 February)

Elliotte Rusty Harold

• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Proposal: "Namespace Document" = RDF (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Sunday, 24 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Sunday, 24 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Saturday, 23 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Wednesday, 13 February)
• RE: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 7 February)

Eric van der Vlist

• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Saturday, 23 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Saturday, 23 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: Submission request: the PSVI needs open exposure (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Submission request: the PSVI needs open exposure (Wednesday, 13 February)

Fisher Mark

• RE: Minutes from 4 Feb 2002 TAG teleconference (Thursday, 28 February)

Gavin Thomas Nicol

• Re: New Issue request for TAG: Where does XML fit into the Web Architecture (Wednesday, 13 February)

George Lund

• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Thursday, 28 February)

Graham Klyne

• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• New question: distinguished status of http:? (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [uriMediaType-9] Re: Minutes from 4 Feb 2002 TAG teleconference (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: "charset" is not generic to all media types [nsMediaType-3] (Monday, 4 February)

Ian B. Jacobs

• Re: Crossposting: was Namespace and URIs (Monday, 18 February)
• Minutes from 4 Feb 2002 TAG teleconference (Monday, 11 February)
• [uriMediaType-9] Why does the Web use mime types and not URIs? (Tuesday, 5 February)
• [namespaceDocument-8] What should a "namespace document" look like? (Tuesday, 5 February)

Ian Graham

• Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Thursday, 21 February)

Jacek Kopecky

• RE: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)
• RE: Namespace dispatching (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: Namespace dispatching (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 7 February)

Jason Diamond

• Re: Namespaces are Simply Punctuation (was Re: [namespaceDocument-8] What should a "namespace document" look like?) (Wednesday, 6 February)

John Cowan

• Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: [xml-dev] Namespace and URIs (Monday, 18 February)

Jonathan Borden

• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: Interpretation of XML documents with mixed namespaces [mixedNamespaceMeaning-13] (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist (Thursday, 21 February)
• [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist (Thursday, 21 February)
• [namespaceDocument-8] Re: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: Namespace dispatching (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: Possible Architectural issue with XHTML modularization? (Monday, 18 February)
• Root Namespaces, 'document types' and XPaths (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: [xml-dev] Namespace and URIs (Monday, 18 February)

Joseph Reagle

• Re: "canonical" URIs (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Request for Guidance on XML Encryption changing MedaTypes (Saturday, 16 February)

Julian Reschke

• RE: Namespace dispatching (Wednesday, 20 February)

Jun Fujisawa

• Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Saturday, 16 February)

Larry Masinter

• RE: Namespaces are Simply Punctuation (Wednesday, 6 February)

Mark Baker

• Re: New question: distinguished status of http:? (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: PROPFIND disconnected from GET space? [whenToUseGet-7] (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: Comments on the architecture doc (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: Comments on the architecture doc (Monday, 4 February)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: Eastlake on Mime/URI (Monday, 11 February)

Martin Duerst

• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Wednesday, 13 February)

Masayasu Ishikawa

• Re: Possible Architectural issue with XHTML modularization? (Monday, 18 February)

Micah Dubinko

• RE: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Monday, 25 February)
• RE: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)

MURATA Makoto

• Re: customMediaType-2: RFC 3023 flawed? (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: [nsMediaType-3] Principles and corner cases (Friday, 1 February)

ned.freed@mrochek.com

• Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Wednesday, 20 February)

Norman Walsh

• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: Slight architectural discrepancy between XMl 1.0 & the infoset (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Packaging (was namespaces and MIME types) (Wednesday, 6 February)

Patrick Stickler

• Re: New question: distinguished status of http:? (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Proposal: "Namespace Document" = RDF (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Re: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: Namespace dispatching (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: [xml-dev] Namespace and URIs (Monday, 18 February)
• [namespaceDocument-8] Proposal: "Namespace Document" = RDF (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: Namespaces are Simply Punctuation (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Namespaces are Simply Punctuation (was Re: [namespaceDocument-8] What should a "namespace document" look like?) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Namespaces are Simply Punctuation (was Re: [namespaceDocument-8] What should a "namespace document" look like?) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Namespaces are Simply Punctuation (was Re: [namespaceDocument-8] What should a "namespace document" look like?) (Wednesday, 6 February)

Paul Cotton

• RE: Submission request: the PSVI needs open exposure (Wednesday, 13 February)
• RE: Submission request: the PSVI needs open exposure (Wednesday, 13 February)
• RE: Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs (Tuesday, 12 February)
• RE: Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs (Saturday, 9 February)
• RE: Request for Architects [slightly off topic] (Friday, 8 February)

Paul Grosso

• Re: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)
• RE: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)

Paul Prescod

• Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Monday, 25 February)
• QUERY (was re: PROPFIND) (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be enco uraged...) (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Saturday, 23 February)
• Re: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: Namespace dispatching (Thursday, 21 February)
• Intepretation: whenToUseGet-7 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Namespace dispatching (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: [xml-dev] Namespace and URIs (Monday, 18 February)
• Namespace and URIs (Sunday, 17 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: Eastlake on Mime/URI (Monday, 11 February)
• Proposed Issue: SOAP RPC and URIs (Saturday, 9 February)
• Re: Packaging (was namespaces and MIME types) (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: Comments on the architecture doc (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: Comments on the architecture doc (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: Comments on the architecture doc (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: [nsMediaType-3] Principles and corner cases (Monday, 4 February)

Piotr Kaminski

• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Sunday, 24 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Saturday, 23 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Saturday, 23 February)
• Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Friday, 8 February)

Rick Jelliffe

• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 14 February)
• New Issue request for TAG: Where does XML fit into the Web Architecture (Tuesday, 12 February)

Sean B. Palmer

• [uriMediaType-9] Identifying Content Classes in HTTP Using rdf:type (Saturday, 9 February)

Simon St.Laurent

• updated xmlns media feature (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: Namespace dispatching (Tuesday, 19 February)
• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: customMediaType-2: RFC 3023 flawed? (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: Packaging (was namespaces and MIME types) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: [nsMediaType-3] Principles and corner cases (Monday, 4 February)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Proposal: "Namespace Document" = RDF (Thursday, 28 February)
• Interpretation of XML documents with mixed namespaces [mixedNamespaceMeaning-13] (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: New question: distinguished status of http:? (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: Intepretation: whenToUseGet-7 (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Friday, 22 February)
• PIs considered harmful Was: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: [nsMediaType-3] Principles and corner cases (Saturday, 2 February)
• Re: Comments on the architecture doc (Saturday, 2 February)
• Re: Resource discovery: limits of URIs (Friday, 1 February)

Tim Bray

• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: New question: distinguished status of http:? (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: Namespace dispatching (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] RDDL wishlist (Thursday, 21 February)
• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• RE: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2 (Monday, 18 February)
• Possible Architectural issue with XHTML modularization? (Monday, 18 February)
• [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses (Monday, 18 February)
• Crossposting: was Namespace and URIs (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: customMediaType-2: RFC 3023 flawed? (Thursday, 14 February)
• Eastlake on Mime/URI (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 7 February)
• XML-SW, a thought experiment (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: [namespaceDocument-8] What should a "namespace document" look like? (Tuesday, 5 February)
• customMediaType-2: RFC 3023 flawed? (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: Comments on the architecture doc (Monday, 4 February)
• Slight architectural discrepancy between XMl 1.0 & the infoset (Friday, 1 February)

Williams, Stuart

• [uriMediaType-9]: Draft Finding from 12th February F2F Meeting (Monday, 18 February)

Last message date: Thursday, 28 February 2002 17:53:05 UTC