W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2002

RE: Submission request: the PSVI needs open exposure

From: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:45:13 -0500
Message-ID: <E7AC4500EAB7A442ABA7521D18814397028D1433@tor-msg-01.northamerica.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Eric van der Vlist" <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>, <cmsmcq@acm.org>, <plh@w3.org>
> I have thought that this kind of issue which doesn't seem to belong to
> any WG but is at the frontier between different groups (there are at
> least 4 groups which IMO could feel concerned -namely W3C XML Schema,
> DOM, XPath/XSLT and XQuery) would be better handled by the TAG.

One clarification.  There is an XML Coordination Group within the W3C
that has all of these WGs represented on it.  I will ensure that your
item is discussed by that group but I still encourage you to submit your
views/requirements to the respective WG's comments lists.

/paulc  

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 
<mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com> 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric van der Vlist [mailto:vdv@dyomedea.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 5:10 PM
> To: Paul Cotton
> Cc: www-tag@w3.org; cmsmcq@acm.org; plh@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Submission request: the PSVI needs open exposure
> 
> Paul Cotton wrote:
> >>I think therefore that it is very necessary to define both an API to
> >>expose the PSVI and a simple XML serialization format wich would
allow
> >>to work on the PSVI with the current toolbox.
> >>
> >
> > Have you brought up this issue with the XML Schema WG and/or DOM WG
> > which are responsible for the PSVI technical specification and the
DOM
> > API, respectively?  If not then why are you bringing this to the TAG
> > first?
> 
> I have thought that this kind of issue which doesn't seem to belong to
> any WG but is at the frontier between different groups (there are at
> least 4 groups which IMO could feel concerned -namely W3C XML Schema,
> DOM, XPath/XSLT and XQuery) would be better handled by the TAG.
> 
> Sorry if this is pure ignorance of the W3C policies and usages on my
> side and a waste of your time!
> 
> > If you have brought it up with the responsible WGs then I think it
is
> > appropriate that you provide the TAG with pointers to the issue(s),
its
> > discussion and resolution so that the TAG does not have to do this
> > research itself.
> 
> I have not formally submitted the issue to the WGs but have asked the
> question during the schemas town meeting in Orlando and it has been
> discussed at several occasions on XML-Dev. See for instance the
threads:
> 
> http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200104/threads.html#00430
> http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200110/threads.html#00556
> http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200112/threads.html#00146
> 
> >
> > Please note that the XML Schema public home page Resources section
[1]
> > includes a reference to work on a PSVI serialization format [2].
> 
> Yes, but as far as I know this is a non official work.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Eric
> 
> >
> > /paulc
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema#resources
> > [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/serialized-infoset-schema.html
> >
> > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
> > 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3
> > Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
> > <mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com>
> >
> >
> >
> --
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org
http://dyomedea.com
> http://xsltunit.org      http://4xt.org
http://examplotron.org
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 17:45:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:04 GMT