W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2002

Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses, take 2

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:14:43 -0800
To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <20020219101435.K22773@mnot.net>

On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 10:51:07AM -0500, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> I don't find content negotiation useful in this case, if only for its
> lack of transparency.
> 
> Try resolving:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema
> 
> in both Mozilla and Microsoft Internet Explorer, and you can marvel at
> the difference.  I could have found the schema from Mozilla - as could a
> program - using the RDDL file sent to Internet Explorer, but instead
> it's just dropped on my head.
> 
> Yecch.

Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater here; if we relied on
current implementations (especially those mentioned!) as a metric of
a mechanism's usefulness, we'd have gotten stuck long before now.

Implementation of conneg in browsers is generally woeful; that
doesn't mean that conneg is useless in other situations (such as a
machine negotiating what representation it wants).

-- 
Mark Nottingham
http://www.mnot.net/
 
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 13:14:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:04 GMT