W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2002

Re: [namespaceDocument-8] Proposal: "Namespace Document" = RDF

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 18:29:50 +0100
To: ext Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, ext Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, WWW TAG <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B8A4279E.FB40%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
On 2002-02-28 4:48, "ext Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org> wrote:


>> Later, in the future, when such RDF knowledge can be retrieved by
>> means other than from namespace documents and HTTP, such as via global,
>> distributed knowledge registries, and thus not bound to the use of http:
>> URLs, the need for such "namespace documents" would dissappear, and
>> also all benefit of using http: URLs as namespace URIs -- yet
>> applications would already be used to working with such generalized
>> knowledge and how it is obtained would remain a triviality.
> 
> Still, even though http may morph into new ans splendid forms, the namespace
> document
> as the result of dereferencing the namespace URI would be special
> because it would be publsihed by the owner of that URI and say what thay
> owner meant.
> Even if the semntic web version of google actually supplied you the answers
> in practice.

Quite right. The namespace document would still have special
significance as that specific body of knowledge asserted as
relevant by the namespace "owner". I agree. But also, we would
concievably have many sources of namespace relevant knowledge,
and would not remain bound solely to the namespace document for
it.

Cheers,

Patrick
 

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2002 12:28:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:04 GMT