Re: XML-SW, a thought experiment

I notice the BNF grammar for the contents of xml:lang attribute that 
went away in the second edition made a reappearance here. Is that an 
oversight or deliberate? If deliberate, why?

In either case, RFC 1766 has now been obsoleted by 3066:

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3066.txt

The text should reflect this. (Not that I'm convinced this is a good idea yet.)
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001)           |
|              http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/              |
|   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/   |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java news:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML news: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/     |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+