xml-dist-app@w3.org from September 2001 by author

Alan Kent

Re: sparse arrays - too complex? (Friday, 21 September)
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? (Friday, 21 September)
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? (Friday, 21 September)
sparse arrays - too complex? (Monday, 3 September)

Andrew Layman

RE: Can SOAP be called a XML protocol ? [was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP?] (Friday, 21 September)
RE: sparse arrays - too complex? (Thursday, 20 September)
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Tuesday, 18 September)

Anne Thomas Manes

RE: Sun and independent developers (Monday, 10 September)
RE: Sun and independent developers (Thursday, 6 September)

Bob Cunnings

RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Monday, 17 September)

Bob Hutchison

Re: Issue 4 Proposed Resolution (was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP) (Saturday, 29 September)

Bullard, Claude L (Len)

RE: [xml-dev] Pakistan has an English-language weblog (Monday, 17 September)

cboonchin@yahoo.com

[xml-dist-app] <none> (Thursday, 20 September)

Champion, Mike

RE: Issue 4 Proposed Resolution (was: why no doc type declarati on and PIs in SOAP) (Sunday, 30 September)
RE: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Thursday, 20 September)
RE: Can SOAP be called a XML protocol ? [was: why no doc type dec laration and PIs in SOAP?] (Friday, 21 September)
RE: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Friday, 21 September)
RE: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Friday, 21 September)
RE: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Thursday, 20 September)
RE: Proposed text for XMLBase (Wednesday, 5 September)

christopher ferris

Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution (Friday, 28 September)
Re: Issue 4 Proposed Resolution (was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP) (Friday, 28 September)
Issue #12 proposed resolution (Friday, 28 September)
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Friday, 21 September)
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Friday, 21 September)
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Friday, 21 September)
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Friday, 21 September)
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Thursday, 20 September)
Re: SOAP Application (Thursday, 20 September)
SOAP Application (Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Tuesday, 18 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Tuesday, 18 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Tuesday, 18 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Monday, 17 September)
issue 95 resolution (Monday, 17 September)
Re: Issue 71: Additional actors (Thursday, 6 September)
Re: Issue 71: Additional actors (Thursday, 6 September)

Curtis Alphin

Netscape 4.76 - Sun (Friday, 28 September)

Dan Brickley

Re: Sun and independent developers (Friday, 7 September)

Dan Kohn

RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Monday, 17 September)

Daniel Veillard

Re: XML Protocol WG requests comments by XML Core WG on position on XML Base (Saturday, 8 September)

Dave Winer

Pakistan has an English-language weblog (Sunday, 16 September)
Re: Sun and independent developers (Saturday, 8 September)
Re: Sun and independent developers (Saturday, 8 September)
Re: Sun and independent developers (Friday, 7 September)
Re: Sun and independent developers (Thursday, 6 September)
Sun and independent developers (Thursday, 6 September)

David Fallside

Re: About Chinese version of SOAP 1.2 Draft (Monday, 24 September)

David Orchard

RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Friday, 21 September)
XML Core response to XMLP request on xml:base in SOAP (Wednesday, 12 September)
XML Protocol WG requests comments by XML Core WG on position on XML Base (Friday, 7 September)
RE: Proposed text for XMLBase (Thursday, 6 September)

Dick Brooks

RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Tuesday, 18 September)

Doug Davis

RE: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Saturday, 29 September)
RE: SOAPAction Proposal (Wednesday, 5 September)
RE: SOAPAction Proposal (Tuesday, 4 September)
Re: SOAPAction Proposal (Tuesday, 4 September)
Re: SOAPAction Proposal (Tuesday, 4 September)
RE: Issue 71: Additional actors (Monday, 3 September)

Elliotte Rusty Harold

RE: Sun and independent developers (Friday, 7 September)
Re: Sun and independent developers (Thursday, 6 September)

Eric van der Vlist

Can SOAP be called a XML protocol ? [was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP?] (Friday, 21 September)
Re: XML Schema Vs. DTD - Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Friday, 21 September)
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Thursday, 20 September)

Fennivel Chai

About Chinese version of SOAP 1.2 Draft (Monday, 24 September)

Francis Norton

Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Thursday, 20 September)

Fuchs, Matthew

RE: Sun and independent developers (Friday, 7 September)

Graham Klyne

RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Tuesday, 18 September)
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Tuesday, 18 September)
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Tuesday, 18 September)
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Tuesday, 18 September)
RE: Issue 71: Additional actors (Thursday, 6 September)
RE: Issue 19 closed (Thursday, 6 September)
Issue 19 closed (Thursday, 6 September)
RE: Issue 71: Additional actors (Thursday, 6 September)
RE: SOAPAction Proposal (Wednesday, 5 September)
RE: SOAPAction Proposal (Tuesday, 4 September)
RE: SOAPAction Proposal (Tuesday, 4 September)

Hugo Haas

Minutes of the 5 September 2001 teleconference (Wednesday, 19 September)
Presence of the detail element in a SOAP Fault indicating processing of the SOAP Body (Monday, 10 September)
Re: discarding incorrect namespaces (Monday, 10 September)
Re: Proposed text for closure of issue 45 (Friday, 7 September)
Minutes of the 29 August 2001 teleconference (Thursday, 6 September)

Jacek Kopecky

Re: sparse arrays - too complex? (Friday, 21 September)
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? (Friday, 21 September)
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Friday, 21 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Thursday, 20 September)
why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Thursday, 20 September)
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? (Thursday, 20 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Thursday, 20 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Thursday, 20 September)
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Tuesday, 18 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Tuesday, 18 September)
Re: encodings in RPC (Tuesday, 11 September)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Friday, 21 September)

John J. Barton

Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Thursday, 20 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Thursday, 20 September)
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Tuesday, 18 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Monday, 17 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Monday, 17 September)

Jonathan Marsh

RE: XML Protocol WG requests comments by XML Core WG on position on XML Base (Tuesday, 11 September)

Jones, Matthew

Header/Details Considered Harmful (Monday, 24 September)
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Monday, 17 September)
RE: Questions about the SOAP 2.1 draft (Monday, 17 September)
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Monday, 17 September)
Questions about the SOAP 2.1 draft (Friday, 14 September)

Joshua Allen

RE: Sun and independent developers (Friday, 7 September)

Kremena Gotcheva

XML Schema Vs. DTD - Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Friday, 21 September)

Kurt Cagle

Re: Sun and independent developers (Friday, 7 September)
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? (Monday, 3 September)

Larry Masinter

RE: SOAP Versioning (Friday, 28 September)
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Tuesday, 18 September)
Last Call: Using SOAP in BEEP to Proposed Standard (Sunday, 9 September)
RE: Encoding XML in URIs (Thursday, 6 September)

Marc Hadley

Issue 4 Proposed Resolution (was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP) (Friday, 28 September)
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Thursday, 20 September)
Re: Issue 71: Additional actors (Friday, 7 September)
Re: Proposed text for closure of issue 45 (Monday, 3 September)

Mark Baker

Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution (Monday, 1 October)
Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution (Monday, 1 October)
Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution (Friday, 28 September)
Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution (Friday, 28 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Thursday, 20 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Thursday, 20 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Monday, 17 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Monday, 17 September)
Re: I-D on HTTP resource state model (Wednesday, 12 September)
I-D on HTTP resource state model (Wednesday, 12 September)
Re: Encoding XML in URIs (Thursday, 6 September)

Mark Jones

new issue on Processing SOAP Messages (Tuesday, 11 September)
Re: Issue 71: Additional actors (Thursday, 6 September)
RE: Issue 71: Additional actors (Thursday, 6 September)
RE: Issue 71: Additional actors (Monday, 3 September)

Mark Nottingham

Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution (Monday, 1 October)
Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution (Monday, 1 October)
Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution (Monday, 1 October)
Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution (Friday, 28 September)
Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution (Friday, 28 September)
Re: Issue #12 proposed resolution (Friday, 28 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Friday, 21 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Thursday, 20 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Thursday, 20 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Thursday, 20 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Thursday, 20 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Thursday, 20 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: Proposal for Issues 11/13 (Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
Proposal for Issues 11/13 (Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Tuesday, 18 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Tuesday, 18 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Tuesday, 18 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Tuesday, 18 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Tuesday, 18 September)
Re: Questions about the SOAP 2.1 draft (Sunday, 16 September)
Re: discarding incorrect namespaces (Wednesday, 12 September)
Re: discarding incorrect namespaces (Monday, 10 September)
Re: Issue 71: Additional actors (Thursday, 6 September)
Re: Encoding XML in URIs (Thursday, 6 September)
Re: Encoding XML in URIs (Thursday, 6 September)
Encoding XML in URIs (Wednesday, 5 September)
Re: SOAPAction Proposal (Wednesday, 5 September)
Re: SOAPAction Proposal (Tuesday, 4 September)
Re: SOAPAction Proposal (Tuesday, 4 September)
Ordering of Processing [was: Regrets / Issue 71] (Monday, 3 September)
Re: Issue 71: Additional actors (Saturday, 1 September)

Martin Gudgin

SOAP Versioning (Tuesday, 25 September)
SOAP Versioning (Monday, 24 September)
XML Protocol WG response to XML Schema base64 questions (Wednesday, 5 September)

Mike Dierken

RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Monday, 24 September)
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
RE: I-D on HTTP resource state model (Thursday, 13 September)

mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp

Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Thursday, 20 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Thursday, 20 September)
text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Monday, 17 September)

Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Re: Header/Details Considered Harmful (Tuesday, 25 September)
RE: Can SOAP be called a XML protocol ? [was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP?] (Friday, 21 September)
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Friday, 21 September)
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Friday, 21 September)
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Friday, 21 September)
Re: XML Protocol WG requests comments by XML Core WG on position on XML Base (Sunday, 9 September)
RE: Proposed text for XMLBase (Thursday, 6 September)
Re: SOAPAction Proposal (Tuesday, 4 September)

Oisin Hurley

RE: SOAP Versioning (Wednesday, 26 September)
RE: Questions about the SOAP 2.1 draft (Saturday, 15 September)

Paul Denning

Re: Issue 4 Proposed Resolution (was: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP) (Sunday, 30 September)

Paul Prescod

Re: Encoding XML in URIs (Thursday, 6 September)

Paulo Gaspar

RE: Sun and independent developers (Friday, 7 September)
RE: Sun and independent developers (Friday, 7 September)
RE: Sun and independent developers (Friday, 7 September)

Pete Hendry

Re: sparse arrays - too complex? (Friday, 21 September)

Rich Salz

Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Saturday, 29 September)
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Friday, 21 September)
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? (Friday, 21 September)
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? (Friday, 21 September)
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? (Friday, 21 September)
Re: sparse arrays - too complex? (Friday, 21 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Friday, 21 September)
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Thursday, 20 September)
Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Thursday, 20 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Tuesday, 18 September)
Re: I-D on HTTP resource state model (Wednesday, 12 September)
Re: SOAPAction Proposal (Tuesday, 4 September)

Richard Tobin

Re: XML Protocol WG requests comments by XML Core WG on position on XML Base (Wednesday, 12 September)

Robert Shmit

RE: SOAP Versioning (Thursday, 27 September)

Simon St.Laurent

Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Monday, 17 September)
Re: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Monday, 17 September)

Skip Montanaro

Re: [xml-rpc] Re: Sun and independent developers (Thursday, 6 September)

Steve Vinoski

Re: Header/Details Considered Harmful (Monday, 24 September)

Tyler Close

Re: sparse arrays - too complex? (Sunday, 23 September)

Williams, Stuart

RE: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? (Thursday, 20 September)
Issues with SOAP 1.2 part 1 Editors Draft (Thursday, 20 September)
RE: SOAP Application (Wednesday, 19 September)
RE: Proposal for Issues 11/13 (Wednesday, 19 September)
RE: text/xml for SOAP is incorrect (Wednesday, 19 September)
RE: discarding incorrect namespaces (Thursday, 13 September)
RE: discarding incorrect namespaces (Wednesday, 12 September)
RE: Issue 71: Additional actors (Friday, 7 September)
RE: SOAPAction Proposal (Tuesday, 4 September)
RE: SOAPAction Proposal (Tuesday, 4 September)

Yves Lafon

F2f minutes (Friday, 28 September)

이선헌

I hava question... (Monday, 10 September)

Last message date: Sunday, 30 September 2001 23:49:04 UTC