Re: why no doc type declaration and PIs in SOAP? from Jean-Jacques Moreau on 2001-09-21 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from September 2001)

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 14:23:50 +0200
To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@idoox.com>
CC: christopher ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>, Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <3BAB3156.9D1FA41C@crf.canon.fr>

+1

Jacek Kopecky wrote:

>  Chris,
>  if we say that "receivers SHOULD ignore and MAY generate a
> fault", IMHO we should also say that "a SOAP message SHOULD NOT
> have a DTD or PIs". This would put the same strength of
> expressions on both sides of the story.
>  I'd +1 this. 8-)
>
>                             Jacek Kopecky

Received on Friday, 21 September 2001 08:24:25 UTC