- From: christopher ferris <chris.ferris@Sun.COM>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 12:20:03 -0400
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
+1 to application/soap+xml Mark Baker wrote: > > Murata-san, > > > Dear the XML Protocol WG, > > > > As a co-author of RFC 3023 (XML Media Types), I repeat my claim. Use > > of text/xml for SOAP is incorrect. Please use application/xml, > > instead. > > I assume you're primarily suggesting that text/xml not be used, not that > application/xml should be used. I personally believe that > application/soap+xml is the best choice as it; > > - helps with the migration to application/xml once it can be assumed > that XML processors dispatch on namespaces (see RFC 3023, last > paragraph in Sec 3). > - provides a syntactically cleaner place for holding information > previously conveyed via SOAPAction (a parameter on the media type, > which can't be done to application/xml without updating 3023) > > Thanks for bringing this up again, it's an important point. > > MB
Received on Monday, 17 September 2001 12:20:05 UTC