- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:33:20 -0400
- To: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- CC: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@idoox.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
> (ii) Adding them doesn't add much to the complexity, they are part of > XML so we should allow them. ugh, now i have to add entity handling, attribute default values, etc? DTD adds a big burden -- I don't think it would still be possible to build a SOAP processor directly on SAX, e.g. Also, isn't it Official W3C Opinion that DTD's are declasses -- schema is the way to go? > My original suggestion for resolution of issue 4 was to retain their > current status (i.e. not allowed) and add text requiring a SOAP > processor to generate a fault when a message containing one was received. Hmm, since the spec currently says their illegal, an incoming message that has them is ill-formed, so aren't you supposed to fault now anyway? (I do.) But a little repetition and redundancy never hurt too much, I s'pose. /r$ -- Zolera Systems, Your Key to Online Integrity Securing Web services: XML, SOAP, Dig-sig, Encryption http://www.zolera.com
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2001 13:35:03 UTC