- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 08:05:40 -0700
- To: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
- Cc: Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com, Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Yes. Many implementations already generate SOAPAction, and some have specific requirements for it; if they read 'optional', they may just continue to generate it, leaving us in an interop mess. If we change it to something that says 'you should have a good reason to use this', that raises the bar a bit. On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 10:37:24AM -0400, Rich Salz wrote: > > but I do think it's presence in the SOAP v1.1 spec gives it > > special status in our work. I think users will expect us to give > > some guidance regarding its use, even if we do so only in a note. > > Absolutely. > -- > Zolera Systems, Your Key to Online Integrity > Securing Web services: XML, SOAP, Dig-sig, Encryption > http://www.zolera.com -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2001 11:05:42 UTC