Re: Encoding XML in URIs

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
> I am *very* reluctant to re-start the 'web infrastructure'
> discussion, but XForms' work in URI encoding seems relevant;
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xforms-20010828/slice11.html#rpm-send-urlencoded
> 
> IMHO there are still fundamental and practical issues with this use
> of URIs, and personally I think this is something the TAG should
> address as soon as it gets instantiated, as it seems to be of
> interest in more than one context.

I'm curious about whether anyone knows of a "deep" reason that URIs
cannot merely have components that are deeply hierarchical and nested?
Just because that has never been done before?
-- 
Take a recipe. Leave a recipe.  
Python Cookbook!  http://www.ActiveState.com/pythoncookbook

Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2001 20:13:01 UTC