- From: Kurt Cagle <cagle@olywa.net>
- Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:52:18 -0700
- To: <paulo.gaspar@krankikom.de>, <xml-rpc@yahoogroups.com>, <soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com>, <decentralization@yahoogroups.com>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: "Tim O'Reilly" <tim@oreilly.com>
Actually, I think there's a pretty standard general usage. XML RPC is a generic term that is used to describe any XML based remote procedure call language, and could just as easily subsume SOAP, for instance, as Dave Winer's usage. XML-RPC, on the other hand, almost always seems to specifically refer to the initial RadioLand XML based RPC spec. Granted, he didn't attempt to trademark the term (difficult since XML is already trademarked by the W3C), but at the same time he probably does have some legitimate claim to having been one of the first *popularizers* of using XML for an RPC (for what its worth, I wrote about XML based RPCs back in 1997, but am not ABOUT to wade into this debate beyond that). -- Kurt Cagle ----- Original Message ----- From: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> To: <paulo.gaspar@krankikom.de>; <xml-rpc@yahoogroups.com>; <soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com>; <decentralization@yahoogroups.com>; <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>; <xml-dist-app@w3.org> Cc: "Tim O'Reilly" <tim@oreilly.com> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 1:31 PM Subject: RE: Sun and independent developers > At 9:09 PM +0200 9/7/01, Paulo Gaspar wrote: > > >Elliotte, > > > > > >What you are saying also applies to XML, HTML and other "languages". > > > > > >I mean, what can be more generic than XML (eXtensible Markup Language)? > >Or more generic than HTML (HyperText Markup Language)? > > > > I don't think so. The analogous case would be if either of these were called simply "Markup Language" or perhaps "ML". Both HTML and XML were invented after long experience with many different markup languages so no one presumed that they would be the only one or the last one. XML Schemas and XML-RPC, by contrast, were out the gate relatively early. It's not clear that their inventors gave serious thought to the idea that they might not be the only such language. If they had, then they might have picked less generic names. > -- > > +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ > | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | > +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ > | The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) | > | http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/ | > | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ | > +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ > | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | > | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/ | > +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ >
Received on Friday, 7 September 2001 16:51:50 UTC