- From: Anne Thomas Manes <anne@manes.net>
- Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 11:12:58 -0700
- To: "Dave Winer" <dave@userland.com>, <graham.hamilton@sun.com>, <rahul.sharma@sun.com>, <pelegri@eng.sun.com>
- Cc: "Tim O'Reilly" <tim@oreilly.com>, <xml-prc@yahoogroups.com>, <soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com>, <decentralization@yahoogroups.com>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>, "Xml-Dist-App@W3. Org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Dave, I suspect it's an oversight and not intended as an affront to the XML-RPC community. The API is officially called "Java APIs for XML based RPC", known as JAX/RPC for short. The JSR should reflect this name. I'm sure that Rahul Sharma, Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart, or Graham Hamilton will make sure that the issue is resolved quickly. Regards, Anne Thomas Manes CTO, Idoox > -----Original Message----- > From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Dave Winer > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 7:48 AM > To: xml-rpc@yahoogroups.com; soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com; > decentralization@yahoogroups.com; xml-dev@lists.xml.org; > xml-dist-app@w3.org > Cc: Tim O'Reilly > Subject: Sun and independent developers > > > To whom it may concern.. > > A few months ago a document [1] appeared entitled "Java APIs for > XML RPC." I > sent an email to Anne Thomas-Manes, strenuously objecting. The document > didn't point to XML-RPC [2], although it attempts to survey the > landscape in > XML-over-HTTP protocols. XML-RPC was the first such protocol, and arguably > is the most used, with 45 implementations [3] (including Java), a frozen > spec, and a very active developer community. > > Their lawyers got in the loop and claimed that they had the right > to confuse > developers and users, however, as a "courtesy to Dave Winer," they changed > the document and the crisis was over. Yesterday Paul Nakada [4] discovered > that the document is back in its original form, with support from lots of > well-known companies. This is disturbing. It isn't about me, forget the > courtesy, try self-respect, and support for independent developers. > > There are so many reasons for the XML-RPC community to work with Sun. We > could help them stay in the market if they just worked with us -- instead > they pick on us. Unbelievable. They just must not be thinking > strategically > at Sun. Maybe this could get the conversation going about how to > strengthen > Java to preserve developer choice. It's really quite simple. Just ask and > we'll help you. > > BTW, I got an email from Anne saying she had left Sun to work at Idoox. > Perhaps that has something to do with this reversal. > > Bottom-line, if you work at Sun, or work at one of their partner > companies, > especially if your company is listed as a supporter on that page > [1], get in > touch with the people responsible for this work and ask them to > get in touch > with the XML-RPC community. Instead of trying to roll us over > (why?) -- work > with us. We want a multi-party system. We don't want to get in the trunk > with Microsoft. We want our independence, and for that, we want > to see Java > stay strong. The term XML-RPC means something. Respect that, and > enhance it. > Thanks for listening. > > Dave Winer > UserLand Software > > [1] http://jcp.org/jsr/detail/101.jsp > [2] http://www.xmlrpc.com/ > [3] http://www.xmlrpc.com/directory/1568/implementations > [4] http://mynakada.weblogs.com/2001/09/05 > >
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2001 11:12:21 UTC