RE: SOAPAction Proposal from Henrik Frystyk Nielsen on 2001-09-05 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from September 2001)

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 12:27:12 -0700
To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@zolera.com>, <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, "Doug Davis" <dug@us.ibm.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D04A227C4@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Sounds great!

>Some implementations automagically generate and/or require it, 
>IIRC. Stuart's question is framed very nicely; the optionality 
>should be the service provider's/service consumer's, not the 
>particular stack implementation's. Perhaps if we target 
>(groan) the 'optional', this would be resolved to everyone's 
>satisfaction?

Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2001 15:28:19 UTC