Henrik,
Certainly you agree that SOAP is it's own thing.
It just happens to also be XML. SOAP has its own process
model. Why the resistance to a soap-specific
media type? Certainly seems mostly harmless to me.
Cheers,
Chris
Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:
>
> >Sure, why not? You can reflect the SOAP version in a MIME
> >"version" parameter on the Content-Type header. Dispatchers
> >can choose whether to use this (or not) as they see fit. A
> >SOAP processor can make the determination as to support of the
> >namespace by inspecting the namespace and further dispatching
> >as needed (or loading the right modules, schema, whatever).
>
> How is this different from regular XML processing to the degree that it
> requires a special content type?
>
> Henrik