www-ws-desc@w3.org from May 2006 by date

Wednesday, 31 May 2006

• RE: Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} Rogers, Tony
• RE: New Woden Results Arthur Ryman
• RE: New Woden Results Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} Roberto Chinnici
• Re: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with Eachother Roberto Chinnici
• RE: Component Model Results Arthur Ryman
• Re: 27 April 2006 WSDL Implementer's call minutes Arthur Ryman
• RE: interchange issue: empty properties vs. absent properties Arthur Ryman
• New Woden Results Arthur Ryman
• Fw: Missing properties in the property summary (Core table d-1, second half) Arthur Ryman
• Re: Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with Eachother Jacek Kopecky
• Violated Assertions added to TestMetadata.xml Arthur Ryman
• RE: FW: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Jonathan Marsh
• RE: FW: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Arthur Ryman
• RE: FW: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Rogers, Tony
• Re: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Arthur Ryman
• Re: "interface" attribute info item on service component Arthur Ryman
• Re: Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding Arthur Ryman
• RE: FW: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Arthur Ryman

Tuesday, 30 May 2006

• RE: FW: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Jonathan Marsh
• sparql-protocol-query.wsdl Jonathan Marsh
• Interop topics and references Jonathan Marsh
• Re: "interface" attribute info item on service component Arthur Ryman
• RE: "interface" attribute info item on service component Arthur Ryman
• Re: "interface" attribute info item on service component Ramkumar Menon
• RE: SparqlQuery-1G missing schemaLocation Arthur Ryman
• Agenda: 23 May 2006 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: SparqlQuery-1G missing schemaLocation Jonathan Marsh

Thursday, 25 May 2006

• Re: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with Eachother John Kaputin (gmail)

Wednesday, 24 May 2006

• Re: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with Eachother John Kaputin (gmail)
• Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} John Kaputin (gmail)
• Re: Comment on Part 2, Section 6.5.2 John Kaputin (gmail)
• Re: Comment on Part 2, Section 5.9.3 John Kaputin (gmail)
• Re: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with Eachother John Kaputin (gmail)

Friday, 26 May 2006

• HTTPHeader name should be xs:string, not xs:QName John Kaputin (gmail)

Tuesday, 23 May 2006

• Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension properties John Kaputin (gmail)

Tuesday, 30 May 2006

• Re: SparqlQuery-1G missing schemaLocation Arthur Ryman
• Re: SparqlQuery-1G missing schemaLocation Youenn Fablet
• SparqlQuery-1G missing schemaLocation Jonathan Marsh
• RE: "interface" attribute info item on service component Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding John Kaputin (gmail)
• Re: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Youenn Fablet
• Re: "interface" attribute info item on service component Ramkumar Menon
• RE: "interface" attribute info item on service component Rogers, Tony
• Re: "interface" attribute info item on service component Ramkumar Menon
• RE: Uniqueness of QNames in 'extends' attribute Rogers, Tony
• Re: FW: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Arthur Ryman
• Re: "interface" attribute info item on service component Arthur Ryman
• RE: Uniqueness of QNames in 'extends' attribute Arthur Ryman
• Re: Missing properties in the property summary (Core table d-1, second half) Arthur Ryman
• Re: Inline schemas with no target namespace Arthur Ryman
• Re: Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension properties Arthur Ryman
• Re: When does {safety} appear? Arthur Ryman
• Re: when does wsoap:code appear? Arthur Ryman

Monday, 29 May 2006

• Re: Comment on Part 2, Section 6.5.2 Arthur Ryman
• Re: Comment on Part 2, Section 5.9.3 Arthur Ryman
• RE: interchange issue: empty properties vs. absent properties Arthur Ryman
• RE: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with Eachother Arthur Ryman
• Re: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Arthur Ryman
• RE: Interchange result update. Arthur Ryman
• Re: Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding Arthur Ryman
• RE: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Jonathan Marsh
• Re: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Youenn Fablet
• RE: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Control over Interface Extensions Arthur Ryman
• Re: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Youenn Fablet

Sunday, 28 May 2006

• Control over Interface Extensions Ramkumar Menon

Friday, 26 May 2006

• Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding John Kaputin (gmail)
• RE: Interchange result update. Lawrence Mandel

Thursday, 25 May 2006

• No implementor call today? Lawrence Mandel
• RE: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with Eachother Jonathan Marsh
• RE: interchange issue: empty properties vs. absent properties Jonathan Marsh

Wednesday, 24 May 2006

• RE: interchange issue: empty properties vs. absent properties Rogers, Tony
• Interchange result update. Jonathan Marsh
• RE: interchange issue: empty properties vs. absent properties Jonathan Marsh
• interchange issue: empty properties vs. absent properties Jonathan Marsh
• when does wsoap:code appear? Jonathan Marsh
• When does {safety} appear? Jonathan Marsh

Tuesday, 23 May 2006

• RE: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Jonathan Marsh
• FW: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Jonathan Marsh
• "interface" attribute info item on service component Ramkumar Menon
• RE: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Jonathan Marsh
• Missing properties in the property summary (Core table d-1, second half) Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Arthur Ryman
• RE: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Arthur Ryman
• Probable Regrets for May 25 telecons Arthur Ryman

Thursday, 18 May 2006

• Regrets for 18 May 2006 WS Description telcon Charlton Barreto

Tuesday, 23 May 2006

• RE: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format IC Dept.- MIT-Maqbool Al Maimani
• Re: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Youenn Fablet
• RE: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Jonathan Marsh

Monday, 22 May 2006

• Re: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Arthur Ryman
• Re: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Youenn Fablet

Friday, 19 May 2006

• Inline schemas with no target namespace Ramkumar Menon
• Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with Eachother Arthur Ryman
• RE: Uniqueness of QNames in 'extends' attribute Rogers, Tony
• WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Arthur Ryman
• WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format Update Arthur Ryman
• Part 2, 5.6.3 XML Representation of subcodes is inconsistent Arthur Ryman
• Re: Uniqueness of QNames in 'extends' attribute Arthur Ryman

Thursday, 18 May 2006

• Minutes, 18 May 2006 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Test Suite Additions and Woden Results Arthur Ryman

Wednesday, 17 May 2006

• Agenda: 18 May 2006 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Some new interchange results Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Some new interchange results Arthur Ryman

Tuesday, 16 May 2006

• RE: Some new interchange results Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Some new interchange results Arthur Ryman
• Some new interchange results Youenn Fablet

Thursday, 11 May 2006

• Minutes, 11 May 2006 WS Description WG telcon Jonathan Marsh

Wednesday, 10 May 2006

• RE: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? Tom Jordahl
• RE: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? Sanjiva Weerawarana

Tuesday, 9 May 2006

• Agenda: 11 May 2006 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format Updated with Part 2 Extensions Arthur Ryman
• RE: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format Updated with Part 2 Extensions Jonathan Marsh
• Comment on Part 2, Section 6.5.2 Arthur Ryman
• Comment on Part 2, Section 5.9.3 Arthur Ryman
• WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format Updated with Part 2 Extensions Arthur Ryman

Monday, 8 May 2006

• Re: RDF Mapping status report Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? Tom Jordahl
• RE: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? Arthur Ryman
• RE: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? Tom Jordahl
• Re: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? Lawrence Mandel
• Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? Tom Jordahl
• Re: wsdl2.0 and basic profile 2.0 Arthur Ryman
• RDF Mapping status report Jacek Kopecky

Sunday, 7 May 2006

• wsdl2.0 and basic profile 2.0 Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Component Model Results Arthur Ryman

Saturday, 6 May 2006

• Comments on Part 2, Chapter 6 Arthur Ryman

Friday, 5 May 2006

• RE: Test results rollup Arthur Ryman
• RE: Test results rollup Jonathan Marsh

Thursday, 4 May 2006

• RE: Test results rollup Tom Jordahl
• Re: Test results rollup Roberto Chinnici
• RE: Test results rollup Rogers, Tony
• RE: Test results rollup Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Test results rollup Arthur Ryman
• RE: Test results rollup Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Test results rollup Arthur Ryman
• RE: Test results rollup Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Test results rollup Arthur Ryman
• Part 2 Adjuncts Comments (1 -5) Arthur Ryman
• Test results rollup Jonathan Marsh
• Re: typeDefinitions property optional? Arthur Ryman

Wednesday, 3 May 2006

• Re: typeDefinitions property optional? Amelia A Lewis
• RE: typeDefinitions property optional? Rogers, Tony
• typeDefinitions property optional? Jonathan Marsh

Tuesday, 2 May 2006

• Re: 27 April 2006 WSDL Implementer's call minutes Jeremy Hughes
• Re: 27 April 2006 WSDL Implementer's call minutes Arthur Ryman
• Re: 27 April 2006 WSDL Implementer's call minutes Jeremy Hughes

Monday, 1 May 2006

• RE: Component Model Results Lawrence Mandel

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 May 2006 19:39:46 UTC