- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 20:39:46 -0400
- To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:40:17 UTC
I agree that the spec needs to be tightened to achieve deterministic results. I favour dropping #any and leaving the property as OPTIONAL. Absense of the property equals #any. Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 05/24/2006 10:14 AM To <www-ws-desc@w3.org> cc Subject when does wsoap:code appear? Similarly to safety, it?s not clear when wsoap:code and wsoap:subcode should appear. Both of these properties are OPTIONAL, yet the mapping defaults the value to ?#any?. Thus whether the property appears isn?t deterministic to the WSDL. One implementation could leave it out (e.g. Woden) when it?s not in the WSDL, another could always put it in. The fix seems to be to make the property REQUIRED when the soap binding is in effect, or to remove the ?#any? default and say that no value is the same as ?#any?. [ Jonathan Marsh ][ jmarsh@microsoft.com ][ http://spaces.msn.com/auburnmarshes ]
Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:40:17 UTC