- From: Youenn Fablet <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 16:54:36 +0200
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
- Cc: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2006 14:55:04 UTC
Hi all,
I just looked at the interchange results and thought some simple fixes
might improve our implementation results.
Please find attached some new results. This time, I dumped all parsed
components and not only the ones visible from the top-level description
component. This improves a lot the results 8-)
I tried the comparison tools, which are actually very cool, thanks a lot
for all the good work, jonathan :-)
I just noticed that some of the canonical interchange documents do not
include base64Binary and/or anySimpleType in the type definitions. This
seems to be the biggest (if not the only one) difference between the
canonical results and these results.
Is there any reason not too dump these two simple types ?
Regards,
Youenn
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2006 14:55:04 UTC