RE: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation?

Tom et al,

As we are realizing in the implementors calls, simply having a parser and 
validator is only part of the implementation. We also need code generators 
that create clients and services and that implement the bindings at 
runtime correctly. So Woden can be reused by many runtimes and that would 
count as different implementations.

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca



"Tom Jordahl" <tjordahl@adobe.com> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
05/08/2006 02:52 PM

To
Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
cc

Subject
RE: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation?






He said he is evaluating it and there would have to be a ?very good 
reason? for them to write their own.
 
If Woden is the only Java implementation, that is great.  But it would be 
even better to see a few more before we exit CR. K
 
--
Tom Jordahl
Adobe ColdFusion Team

From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On 
Behalf Of Lawrence Mandel
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 2:43 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Re: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation?
 

>I would guess that he is going to use Woden, but I asked him to clarify 
in my note. 

I hope so. Dan has become very active in the Apache WS project. 

Lawrence Mandel



"Tom Jordahl" <tjordahl@adobe.com> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 
05/08/2006 02:12 PM 


To
<www-ws-desc@w3.org> 
cc
 
Subject
Another WSDL 2.0 implementation?
 


 
 






FYI - I just noticed that XFire is planning on implementing WSDL 2.0:

http://docs.codehaus.org/display/XFIRE/Stack+Comparison


I just sent a note to Dan Diephouse about this to see if we can get him
involved in the implementers group.  I would guess that he is going to
use Woden, but I asked him to clarify in my note.

--
Tom Jordahl
Adobe