- From: Lawrence Mandel <lmandel@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 15:59:58 -0400
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFD95295A2.B486BCB5-ON8525717A.006D60C9-8525717A.006DDC7C@ca.ibm.com>
I've opened the following Woden Jira reports for the problems Jonathan
reported in his post below.
2) http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-16
3) http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-17
4) http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-18
Lawrence Mandel
Software Developer
IBM Rational Software
Phone: 905 - 413 - 3814 Fax: 905 - 413 - 4920
lmandel@ca.ibm.com
"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
05/25/2006 09:42 AM
To
Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
cc
Subject
RE: Interchange result update.
Not really ;-) But I?d appreciate it if you would!
From: Lawrence Mandel [mailto:lmandel@ca.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 9:42 PM
To: Jonathan Marsh
Subject: Re: Interchange result update.
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for the summary. It's good to see others testing Woden and
providing feedback. Care to open Jira reports [1] for these problems?
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/woden/issue_tracking.html
Lawrence Mandel
"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
05/24/2006 03:31 PM
To
<www-ws-desc@w3.org>
cc
Subject
Interchange result update.
I checked in a new version with the new Woden results, my stylesheet
updated to support the soap binding extensions and the safety extension.
(doesn?t yet do the rpc extension).
Naturally, when there was a question I chose my implementation as the
baseline ;-).
Woden results appear to me to suffer from several problems:
1) {safety} property is often missing. I sent an issue on whether
this is a valid interpretation of the spec.
2) When message content model is #none, Woden emits an invalid
<elementDeclaration ref=?id-null?/> reference.
3) When a binding doesn?t specify an interface, Wodwn emits an
invalid <interface ref=?id-null?/> reference.
4) Woden often omits {soap underlying protocol}, though this is a
REQUIRED property in the spec.
5) Some element declaration components still appear to be missing.
[ Jonathan Marsh ][ jmarsh@microsoft.com ][
http://spaces.msn.com/auburnmarshes ]
Received on Friday, 26 May 2006 20:00:13 UTC