RE: typeDefinitions property optional?

I thought the schema built-in types were included implicitly rather than explicitly?
 
Tony Rogers
CA, Inc

________________________________

From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org on behalf of Jonathan Marsh
Sent: Tue 02-May-06 23:01
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: typeDefinitions property optional?



Section 2.1.2 defines the typeDefinitions property as optional, but then states that it contains the build-in simple types from Schema.  I think the result is that it's really not optional at all.  Should we change it to REQUIRED?

 

Also, we might also mention in the mapping that this is the minimum, contrary to the minimum suggested there.

 

 [  Jonathan Marsh  ][  jmarsh@microsoft.com <mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com>   ][  http://spaces.msn.com/auburnmarshes <http://spaces.msn.com/auburnmarshes>   ]