- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 20:39:47 -0400
- To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF464FDE52.D468227F-ON8525717E.0002E8B4-8525717E.0003A97A@ca.ibm.com>
+1 Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 05/24/2006 10:04 AM To <www-ws-desc@w3.org> cc Subject When does {safety} appear? The wsdlx:safe extension is optional ?extension MAY be used?, but adds the ?REQUIRED? {safety} property. The property has a default value of ?false?. >From this I assume that an implementation that supports the extension will always have the safety property present, regardless of whether wsdlx:safe appears in the WSDL. I ask because the Woden interchange results don?t seem to add the property unless the attribute appears in the WSDL -- which is entirely reasonable, and what I also prefer. Namely, the absence of the property should clearly be equivalent to the value ?false?. I think the simple fix is to make the property OPTIONAL and remove the defaulting to ?false?. Then, if the attribute doesn?t appear, the property will be absent. [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#safety [ Jonathan Marsh ][ jmarsh@microsoft.com ][ http://spaces.msn.com/auburnmarshes ]
Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:40:17 UTC