- From: Tom Jordahl <tjordahl@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 11:52:23 -0700
- To: "Lawrence Mandel" <lmandel@ca.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AD0C8E6047016B48A53660CD4888CE39D49EB5@namail4.corp.adobe.com>
He said he is evaluating it and there would have to be a "very good reason" for them to write their own. If Woden is the only Java implementation, that is great. But it would be even better to see a few more before we exit CR. :-| -- Tom Jordahl Adobe ColdFusion Team ________________________________ From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lawrence Mandel Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 2:43 PM To: www-ws-desc@w3.org Subject: Re: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? >I would guess that he is going to use Woden, but I asked him to clarify in my note. I hope so. Dan has become very active in the Apache WS project. Lawrence Mandel "Tom Jordahl" <tjordahl@adobe.com> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 05/08/2006 02:12 PM To <www-ws-desc@w3.org> cc Subject Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? FYI - I just noticed that XFire is planning on implementing WSDL 2.0: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/XFIRE/Stack+Comparison I just sent a note to Dan Diephouse about this to see if we can get him involved in the implementers group. I would guess that he is going to use Woden, but I asked him to clarify in my note. -- Tom Jordahl Adobe
Received on Monday, 8 May 2006 18:52:50 UTC