- From: John Kaputin (gmail) <jakaputin@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 13:12:36 +0100
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
- Cc: woden-dev@ws.apache.org, "John Kaputin" <KAPUTIN@uk.ibm.com>
- Message-ID: <4c2ae8f80605260512m7c946afbj13cd1c361889c1a0@mail.gmail.com>
Can someone please clarify some points about the http transer coding extension properties defined in Part 2 section 6.8.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model [1]? It says the Binding has a {http transfer coding default} property that is available to InterfaceMessageReference and InterfaceFaultReference components. Is this worded correctly? Do components from the abstract interface need http binding information? It also says BindingOperation has a {http transfer coding default} property that is available to BindingMessageReference and BindingFault components. Is 'BindingFault' a mistake, should this say BindingFaultReference? There are no semantic rules about the relationship between the two {http transfer coding default} properties (i.e. in Binding and BindingOperation), so they could potentially be different. I don't think this would make sense, but it seems to be possible according to the way this section is described. Finally, there are no semantic rules about the relationship between BindingOperation's {http transfer coding default} property and the {http transfer coding} properties if its two child components. As an implementor I can infer what that relationship might be, but it would be better if the spec stated in explicitly as it does for default and actual extension properties elsewhere. [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#http-transfer-coding-relate regards, John Kaputin.
Received on Friday, 26 May 2006 20:06:47 UTC