- From: Tom Jordahl <tjordahl@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:17:11 -0700
- To: "Arthur Ryman" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Lawrence Mandel" <lmandel@ca.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc-request@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AD0C8E6047016B48A53660CD4888CE39D49F98@namail4.corp.adobe.com>
Great. Dan has volunteered XFire, but they have not yet started integrating Woden, so I am not sure if the timeframe will work out. -- Tom Jordahl Adobe ColdFusion Team ________________________________ From: Arthur Ryman [mailto:ryman@ca.ibm.com] Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 4:38 PM To: Tom Jordahl Cc: Lawrence Mandel; www-ws-desc@w3.org; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org Subject: RE: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? Tom et al, As we are realizing in the implementors calls, simply having a parser and validator is only part of the implementation. We also need code generators that create clients and services and that implement the bindings at runtime correctly. So Woden can be reused by many runtimes and that would count as different implementations. Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca "Tom Jordahl" <tjordahl@adobe.com> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 05/08/2006 02:52 PM To Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, <www-ws-desc@w3.org> cc Subject RE: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? He said he is evaluating it and there would have to be a "very good reason" for them to write their own. If Woden is the only Java implementation, that is great. But it would be even better to see a few more before we exit CR. :-| -- Tom Jordahl Adobe ColdFusion Team ________________________________ From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lawrence Mandel Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 2:43 PM To: www-ws-desc@w3.org Subject: Re: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? >I would guess that he is going to use Woden, but I asked him to clarify in my note. I hope so. Dan has become very active in the Apache WS project. Lawrence Mandel "Tom Jordahl" <tjordahl@adobe.com> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 05/08/2006 02:12 PM To <www-ws-desc@w3.org> cc Subject Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? FYI - I just noticed that XFire is planning on implementing WSDL 2.0: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/XFIRE/Stack+Comparison I just sent a note to Dan Diephouse about this to see if we can get him involved in the implementers group. I would guess that he is going to use Woden, but I asked him to clarify in my note. -- Tom Jordahl Adobe
Received on Monday, 8 May 2006 21:17:29 UTC