www-webont-wg@w3.org from April 2003 by date

Wednesday, 30 April 2003

• ADMIN: regrets WebOnt telecon 2003-05-01 Jos De_Roo
• Re: Tests Jos De_Roo
• RE: GUIDE: wine.owl Smith, Michael K
• Re: Partial? regrets May 1st Ian Horrocks
• Pre-agenda, Telecon of May 1 Jim Hendler
• Reopen issue 5.2 levels for owl:nothing (qualified action opening) Jim Hendler
• Partial? regrets May 1st Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 29 April 2003

• Re: Tests Ian Horrocks
• Re: Tests Ian Horrocks
• GUIDE: wine.owl Jeremy Carroll
• RE: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons? Jim Hendler
• Re: Tests Jeremy Carroll
• RE: REQUEST: survey of available ontologies, taxonomies, thesauri, lexicons? Michael Denny
• Re: QCRs - How much time are they worth? Ian Horrocks
• Re: Tests Dan Connolly
• Re: Tests Jim Hendler
• Tests Ian Horrocks
• RE: QCRs - How much time are they worth? Charles White
• Adding owl:Nothing to OWL Lite Ian Horrocks

Monday, 28 April 2003

• Re: Moving owl:Nothing from DL to Lite Deborah L. McGuinness
• FYI: "Semantic Interpretation for Speech Recognition" WD for review Dan Connolly
• Re: Moving owl:Nothing from DL to Lite Dan Connolly
• Re: Moving owl:Nothing from DL to Lite Jim Hendler
• Re: Moving owl:Nothing from DL to Lite Ian Horrocks
• RE: Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Jeremy Carroll
• Moving owl:Nothing from DL to Lite Ian Horrocks
• Re: QCRs - How much time are they worth? Jonathan Borden
• Re: Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Jonathan Borden
• RE: QCRs - How much time are they worth? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Possible confusion in Reference Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• QCRs - How much time are they worth? Jim Hendler
• RE: Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Ian Horrocks
• RE: Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Jeremy Carroll
• Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Ian Horrocks

Sunday, 27 April 2003

• Re: TEST: compound document Jos De_Roo
• Re: Guide Comments: Proposed response to Antoine Isaac Jeremy Carroll
• Guide Comments: Proposed response to Antoine Isaac Smith, Michael K

Saturday, 26 April 2003

• Regrets 4/24/03 Telecon Thompson, Lynne R

Friday, 25 April 2003

• Re: inaccuracies in Appendices A, B, and C of OWL Reference Jos De_Roo
• Re: Possible confusion in Reference Jos De_Roo
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Jeff Heflin
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Jeff Heflin
• Possible confusion in Reference Jeff Heflin
• Re: WOWG: Minutes aPRIL 24 telecon Dan Connolly
• WOWG: Minutes aPRIL 24 telecon Dan Connolly
• Special Issue of the International Journal of Electronic Commerce (IJEC) Christoph Bussler
• ISWC 2003 Industrial Track - DEADLINE EXTENSION Christoph Bussler
• Re: inaccuracies in Appendices A, B, and C of OWL Reference Guus Schreiber
• Re: normative status of Appendix B of OWL Reference Guus Schreiber
• Re: tracking comments got a tiny bit easier Jim Hendler

Thursday, 24 April 2003

• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: WebOnt review of QA guidelines Jeremy Carroll
• Re: qualified restrictions - syntax proposal Ian Horrocks
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Jeff Heflin
• qualified restrictions - syntax proposal Jeremy Carroll
• tracking comments got a tiny bit easier Dan Connolly
• Regrets for the May 1st, teleconference yasser.alsafadi@philips.com
• Belated regrets for 2003-04-24 telecon Jos De_Roo
• inaccuracies in Appendices A, B, and C of OWL Reference Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: WOWG: Agenda aPRIL 24 telecon Mike Dean
• Belated regrets for 2003-04-24 telecon Nick Gibbins
• normative status of Appendix B of OWL Reference Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• suggestion for changes to OWL Reference Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Phonecon - April 23 - Regrets Stanton, John
• typo in OWL Reference Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: WebOnt review of QA guidelines Karl Dubost
• Re: Proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0029.html Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0049.html Dan Connolly
• Re: RDF issue with rdf:List Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0029.html Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: S&AS typo Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF issue with rdf:List Jerome Euzenat
• Re: RDF issue with rdf:List Guus Schreiber
• RDF issue with rdf:List Jeremy Carroll
• Proposed response to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0049.html Guus Schreiber
• Telecon Regrets, 24th April Sean Bechhofer
• TEST: compound document Jeremy Carroll
• Re: WOWG: Agenda aPRIL 24 telecon Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: typo in overview Deborah L. McGuinness
• S&AS typo Jeremy Carroll

Wednesday, 23 April 2003

• WebOnt review of QA guidelines Dan Connolly
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Guus Schreiber
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Mike Dean
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Mike Dean
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Jeff Heflin
• probable regrets for april 24 Deborah L. McGuinness
• WOWG: Agenda aPRIL 24 telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: Proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0029.html Dan Connolly
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Ian Horrocks
• proposed reply to [Re: Some comments on OWL S&AS] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0029.html Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Where is the precise syntax of OWL? [was: RE: Suggestions for response to: Some comments on OWL Reference] Guus Schreiber
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Guus Schreiber

Tuesday, 22 April 2003

• potential regrets for April 24 telecon Evan Wallace
• TEST: harder tests - Lite & DL Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Reopening issue 3.2 Qualified Restrictions Dan Connolly
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Sean Bechhofer
• Re: Reopening issue 3.2 Qualified Restrictions Jim Hendler
• REQDOC: Actions complete Jeff Heflin
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Jeff Heflin
• Reopening issue 3.2 Qualified Restrictions Jim Hendler
• typo in overview Jeremy Carroll
• Re: typo in overview Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Guus Schreiber
• TEST: Manfiest file for all tests available Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Guide: Proposed response to comments Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Guide: Proposed response to comments Jim Hendler
• Guide: Proposed response to comments Smith, Michael K

Saturday, 19 April 2003

• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Deborah L. McGuinness

Friday, 18 April 2003

• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Jos De_Roo
• syntax checked test editors draft Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 17 April 2003

• Re: belated regrets: 4/17 telecon Leo Obrst
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions pat hayes
• Re: belated regrets: 4/17 telecon Jos De_Roo
• belated regrets: 4/17 telecon Stanton, John
• belated regrets: 4/17 telecon Leo Obrst
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Jos De_Roo
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions pat hayes
• Re: Fwd: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Ian Horrocks

Wednesday, 16 April 2003

• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Jim Hendler
• Re: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Jonathan Borden
• Re: Fwd: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Dan Connolly
• Fwd: Case for Reinstatement of Qualified Cardinality Restrictions Jim Hendler
• WOWG: telecon cancelled (Apr 17) Guus Schreiber

Tuesday, 15 April 2003

• Re: TEST agenda item Jos De_Roo
• regrets 17 april Jeremy Carroll
• Re: small omission in S&AS Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• TEST agenda item Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0029.html Dan Connolly
• Re: Guide: Proposed response to comments Dan Connolly
• RE: Minutes: Telecon April 10, 2003 Thompson, Lynne R

Monday, 14 April 2003

• Re: TEST: LC plan Jos De_Roo
• Guide: Proposed response to comments Smith, Michael K
• WOWG; discussion items Guus Schreiber
• Re: proposed response for http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0023.ht ml Guus Schreiber
• Re: proposed response for http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0023.ht ml Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0029.html Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: proposed response for http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0023.ht ml Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 11 April 2003

• Re: proposed response for http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0023.ht ml Ian Horrocks
• rdf:XMLLiteral disallowed or permitted? Jeremy Carroll
• small omission in S&AS Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Suggestions for response to: Some comments on OWL Reference Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 10 April 2003

• TEST: LC plan Jeremy Carroll
• regrets WebOnt telecon 2003-04-10 Jos De_Roo
• Minutes: Telecon April 10, 2003 Smith, Michael K
• RE: Suggestions for response to: Some comments on OWL Reference Jeremy Carroll
• Re: S&AS: not enough type statements OWL Full-entailed from empty RDF graph Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: S&AS: not enough type statements OWL Full-entailed from empty RDF graph Jeremy Carroll
• my action items [was Re: WOWG: agenda April 10 telecon (revised)] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• regrets for 10 April teleconference Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: S&AS: not enough type statements OWL Full-entailed from empty RDF graph Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Suggestions for response to: Some comments on OWL Reference Jeremy Carroll
• Re: S&AS: not enough type statements OWL Full-entailed from empty RDF graph Jim Hendler
• Re: WOWG: agenda April 10 telecon Mike Dean
• Re: S&AS: not enough type statements OWL Full-entailed from empty RDF graph Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Regrets, 10th April Telecon... Stanton, John
• Regrets, 10th April Telecon... Sean Bechhofer
• WOWG: agenda April 10 telecon (revised) Guus Schreiber
• S&AS: not enough type statements OWL Full-entailed from empty RDF graph herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Suggestions for response to: Some comments on OWL Reference Guus Schreiber
• Probable regrets Ian Horrocks

Wednesday, 9 April 2003

• regrets: 4/10 telecon Leo Obrst
• Re: proposed response for http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0023.ht ml Jim Hendler
• Regrets (was Re: WOWG: agenda April 10 telecon) Dlmcg1@aol.com
• proposed response for http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0023.html Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• WOWG: agenda April 10 telecon Guus Schreiber
• And more news Jim Hendler

Tuesday, 8 April 2003

• Seems we made the news Jim Hendler

Saturday, 5 April 2003

• ISWC2003 CFP deadline extended Mike Dean
• Re: URGENT: train wreck coming, action needed. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: URGENT: train wreck coming, action needed. (was: Fwd: URI-CG group chartered) pat hayes
• Re: URGENT: train wreck coming, action needed. (was: Fwd: URI-CG group chartered) pat hayes

Friday, 4 April 2003

• Re: URGENT: train wreck coming, action needed. (was: Fwd: URI-CG group chartered) Dan Connolly
• Fwd: [closed] reagle-01 reagle-02 XMLLiterals and exc-c14n Jim Hendler
• Re: URGENT: train wreck coming, action needed. (was: Fwd: URI-CG group chartered) Michael Mealling
• URGENT: train wreck coming, action needed. (was: Fwd: URI-CG group chartered) pat hayes
• new affiliation Guus Schreiber
• RE: new version of S&AS (was Re: Minutes: Telecon 3rd April 2003) Jeremy Carroll
• new version of S&AS (was Re: Minutes: Telecon 3rd April 2003) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Minutes: Telecon 3rd April 2003 Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 3 April 2003

• Belated REGRETS: Agenda/Logistics telecon of April 3, 2003 Thompson, Lynne R
• WOWG: Handling Last Call Comments Jim Hendler
• Re: comments on handling comments Dan Connolly
• Re: S&AS comments Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• belated regrets for telecon of April 3, 2003 Jos De_Roo
• comments on handling comments Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Proposed simplification of datatype expressions pat hayes
• Regrets for 3-Apr-03 Jonathan Dale
• Regrets for Agenda/Logistics telecon of April 3, 2003 Stanton, John
• Regrets for Agenda/Logistics telecon of April 3, 2003 Marwan Sabbouh
• Regrets for 2003-04-03 telecon Nick Gibbins
• Regrets for 4/3/2003 teleconference yasser.alsafadi@philips.com
• Regrets for telecon of April 3, 2003 Jerome Euzenat
• Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics telecon of April 3, 2003 Jim Hendler

Wednesday, 2 April 2003

• Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics telecon of April 3, 2003 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Regrets for 3 April 2003 telecon Evan Wallace
• Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics telecon of April 3, 2003 Jim Hendler
• Re: ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics telecon of April 3, 2003 Dan Connolly
• ADMIN: Agenda/Logistics telecon of April 3, 2003 Jim Hendler
• Regrets, 3rd April Sean Bechhofer
• Re: Syntax NP Complete - Hamiltonian Paths Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Syntax NP Complete - Hamiltonian Paths Jeremy Carroll
• Last Call Memo Sent to Chairs Jim Hendler

Tuesday, 1 April 2003

• OMG Ontology Definition RFP issued Evan Wallace
• OMG Ontology Definition RFP issued Evan Wallace

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 April 2003 17:42:53 UTC