- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 13:59:45 +0200
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- CC: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
I will include this under agenda item 5 (response to RDF Core) of today's telecon. Guus Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > A last call issue being discussed on RDF Core at the moment concerns > 'redundant' rdf:type rdf:List triples. > > see: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0586.html > > I have suggested that OWL needs these triples, and I am currently arguing > against their removal. > I believe RDF Core WG would value a formal or informal comment from WOWG on > this issue. > > It seems to me that removing these triples, while technically feasible, is a > small amount of work for RDF Core and a large amount of work for Web Ont. > Also, given that this construct is essentially the daml:collection construct, > the default is not to change, but to emit the equivalent of the daml:List > triples. > Might it be possible to have a minute or two on this under AOB today? > > Jeremy > > > > -- NOTE: new affiliation per April 1, 2003 Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718 E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/ [under construction]
Received on Thursday, 24 April 2003 07:59:47 UTC