- From: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 00:44:40 +0100
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
For what it's worth, I concur with Peter's reply. As you know, I have always argued for owl:nothing to be in Lite. Ian On April 9, Jim Hendler writes: > > Peter - I think this would handle things right, and we could reopen > the issue of whether owl:nothing should be in Lite. I have one small > suggestion > > >I believe that the explanatory text adequately makes the distinction > >between named and anonymous individuals, and that there does not need to be > >separate productions for them, particularly as the productions are very > >similar. > > > How about citing some of the relevant text and saying > > The following text > " ... " > explains the difference between named and anonymous individuals, > There does not need to be separate productions for them as the > productions are very similar. > > this way, you can direct him to the particular part of the document > that answers his question, rather than making him search for it. > > -JH > > > > -- > Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu > Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 > Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) > Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 240-731-3822 (Cell) > http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler >
Received on Saturday, 12 April 2003 11:54:47 UTC