Re: S&AS: not enough type statements OWL Full-entailed from empty RDF graph

From: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Subject: RE: S&AS: not enough type statements OWL Full-entailed from empty RDF graph
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:03:45 +0200

> > >I propose augmenting the common semantic conditions to fix these issues.
> > >
> >
> > Umm, how much does this change our design/test cases?  Let's be
> > careful not to do changes during LC without care -- basically, I'm
> > hoping this is essentially an "editing change" and not a significant
> > design issue...
> >
> 
> 
> I find that somewhat difficult.
> 
> This is a bug fix.
> 
> No test cases that we have approved are impacted.
> However it is a design change which is externally visible.
> 
> Our LC process needs to accomodate bugs detected by Herman and fixed by
> Peter.
> IMO the process we have for handling LC comments from the public would
> suffice, and Herman should submit his e-mail to public-webont-comments.
> 
> 
> Jeremy

I don't know if Herman needs to submit to public-webont-comments.   In my
private copy of S&AS I pointed to Hermans www-webont-wg message in the
change log.  This might suffice.

peter

Received on Thursday, 10 April 2003 12:10:18 UTC