- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 18:20:04 -0400
- To: "webont" <www-webont-wg@w3.org>, "Jim Hendler" <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
As I recall the discussion at the Amsterdam F2F -- I had wondered if such features would be needed by biomedical ontologies and thought that I was told that this wasn't the case. The use cases he cites are compelling (at least to me), and if indeed qualified cardinalities *are* needed to support these then I strongly support reopening the issue. Jonathan > > The following long message (from [1]) comes from Alan Rector to our > comments list, addressing the issue of the qualified constraints - > basically, he's asking us to reopen issue 3.2 Qualified Cardinality > constraints. Guus and I would like to hear the WG's feelings on > this. Since there's no specific document addressed (although it > would require changes in every document), Guus and I will handle this > email and its response. > -JH > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0040.html >
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2003 18:20:12 UTC