- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 12:55:03 +0100
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
> Yuzhong Qu: > > 1. The PRECISE SYNTAX of OWL > etc. > > I wonder whether Prof. Qu should be directed towards section 4.2 of S&AS and > maybe the following phrase from the preamble at the beginning of 4 > > "the mapping rules implicitly define a set of graphs, which syntactically > characterise OWL DL in RDF/XML." > > For me, those two parts of the WDs are where the precise syntax of OWL is > defined, and they are not prejudiced by the abstract syntax being informal. > (i.e. the level of formality of the abstract syntax is fit for purpose) > > I note the editor could do this without further WG discussion. > > Jeremy The problem with pointing to the mapping table as the source for the OWL syntax is that it only defines the syntax of OWL DL/Lite. One could argue that only Appendx B of Ref gives the precise syntax for OWL Full. I propose to spend 5 min. at the telecon discussing this. Guus --- NOTE: new affiliation per April 1, 2003 Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718 E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/ [under construction]
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2003 07:54:48 UTC