- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 22:47:03 +0300
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
I reworked Sean's tests to: - be syntactically correct - be consistency or inconsistency tests rather than non-entailments or entailments I copied his tests and reworked them to be in OWL LIte (except for those using a cardinality constraint > 1) These new Lite tests can be found in http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/XXL#proposed-dl-600-harderlite I am still concerned that the tests do not adequately excercise the known-to-be-difficult parts of OWL DL. The 'DL' tests can in the main, be reformulated as lite tests. We should, IMO, have tests that exercise descriptions of finite collections of things with rich interactions. I am wondering whether I can give a detailed description of my Venn triangles http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/jjc (the picture) in OWL DL - I think that might present a different sort of challenge to a classic DL test with a single bell or whistle. Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 16:46:51 UTC