- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:07:15 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
[Proposed reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Apr/0044.html] Again, thank you for your comments. I do not propose to make any change here, as I feel that adding a new kind of description does not help the exposition. > Another suggestion to the Abstract Syntax of OWL Lite: > > In the current spec, > type ::= classID | restriction (in Lite) > type ::= description (in DL ) > super ::= classID | restriction > description ::= classID | restriction|... > > Please consider the possibility: > type ::= descriptionLite (in Lite) > super ::= descriptionLite > descriptionLite ::= classID | restriction > > > Thanks for your concern! > > Yuzhong Qu Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research Lucent Technologies
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2003 09:07:24 UTC