- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 21:15:02 +0300
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
I am not following this thread, but ... > > -> section 3.4.2 > > > > > > [ > > > owl:maxCardinality can be used to specify an upper > > > bound. owl:minCardinality can be used to specify a lower bound. In > > > combination, the two can be used to specify a range. ] > > > > > > Perhaps a typo : "cardinality" (or "owl:cardinality") instead of > > > "range" ? > > > > I'm using range in the [n...m] sense. Will change to "numeric range". > > For my humble brains it stills sound confusing. A numerical function > may have something called a "numeric range", but in my opinion it > would still be the "owl:range" meaning (even though restrected to a > set of numbers). How about using "cardinality range" ? My 2c is: "integer interval" a standard mathematical term for the concept you are after (I think) without using the r word. Jeremy
Received on Sunday, 27 April 2003 15:26:14 UTC