- From: Jerome Euzenat <Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 14:05:58 +0200
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Hello,
Dans son message (RDF issue with rdf:List) du 24/04/2003,
Jeremy Carroll écrit:
>A last call issue being discussed on RDF Core at the moment concerns
>'redundant' rdf:type rdf:List triples.
>
>see:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0586.html
>
>I have suggested that OWL needs these triples, and I am currently arguing
>against their removal.
Can you tell why OWL needs them?
I looks like a syntactic issue for me. If you add in the semantics
that whatever with a rdf:first is a list, then if the triples are not
in the graph they are a consequence of it.
>I believe RDF Core WG would value a formal or informal comment from WOWG on
>this issue.
>
>It seems to me that removing these triples, while technically feasible, is a
>small amount of work for RDF Core and a large amount of work for Web Ont.
>Also, given that this construct is essentially the daml:collection construct,
>the default is not to change, but to emit the equivalent of the daml:List
>triples.
>Might it be possible to have a minute or two on this under AOB today?
--
Jérôme Euzenat __
/ /\
INRIA Rhône-Alpes, _/ _ _ _ _ _
/_) | ` / ) | \ \ /_)
655, avenue de l'Europe, (___/___(_/_/ / /_(_________________
Montbonnot St Martin, / http://www.inrialpes.fr/exmo
38334 Saint-Ismier cedex, / Jerome.Euzenat@inrialpes.fr
France____________________/ Jerome.Euzenat@free.fr
Received on Thursday, 24 April 2003 08:05:48 UTC