www-tag@w3.org from January 2002 by author

Agnes kielen

Re: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Thursday, 3 January)

Alan Richmond

Re: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Friday, 4 January)

Barstow Art (NMP/Boston)

Issue request for the TAG: XForms (Friday, 18 January)

Bharat Gogia

RE: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Thursday, 3 January)

Chris Lilley

Re[2]: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms] (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms] (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re[2]: Clark's commentary (Tuesday, 8 January)
Re[2]: Clark's commentary (Tuesday, 8 January)
Re[2]: Is 'testability' a useful architectural constraint? (Monday, 7 January)
Is 'testability' a useful architectural constraint? (Monday, 7 January)
Re[2]: Clark's commentary (Monday, 7 January)
Re[2]: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Friday, 4 January)
Re[2]: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Friday, 4 January)
Re[2]: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Friday, 4 January)
Re[2]: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Friday, 4 January)
Re: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Friday, 4 January)

Christopher Ferris

Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)

Cohen, Aaron M

RE: Re[2]: Is 'testability' a useful architectural constraint? (Monday, 7 January)
RE: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Thursday, 3 January)
RE: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Thursday, 3 January)

cutlass

language bindings for extending functionality (Thursday, 24 January)

Dan Connolly

Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be enco uraged...) (Thursday, 24 January)
GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms] (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: Media types (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Clark's commentary (Monday, 7 January)

David E. Cleary

RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms] (Wednesday, 23 January)
RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms] (Wednesday, 23 January)

David Orchard

Issue? Supporting documentation for Issue resolution (Monday, 28 January)
RE: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
RE: Media types (Wednesday, 9 January)
RE: Re[2]: Clark's commentary (Tuesday, 8 January)
RE: Clark's commentary (Monday, 7 January)
RE: Clark's commentary (Monday, 7 January)
RE: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Thursday, 3 January)

Duane Nickull

Request for Architects [slightly off topic] (Thursday, 3 January)
Re: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Thursday, 3 January)
Re: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Thursday, 3 January)

Edwin Ortega

Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)

Elliotte Rusty Harold

RE: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Monday, 28 January)

Gavin Thomas Nicol

Re: QUERY (Thursday, 31 January)
Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: Media types (Friday, 18 January)
Re: Media types (Friday, 18 January)
Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)

Graham Klyne

RE: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: Fwd: Three bits on MediaTypes and IANA (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: A suggestion for TAG output (Monday, 14 January)
Re: "Homework" (was: [Minutes] 7 Jan 2002 TAG teleconference) (Wednesday, 9 January)
"Homework" (was: [Minutes] 7 Jan 2002 TAG teleconference) (Wednesday, 9 January)
Web architecture and specification overlap (Monday, 7 January)

Ian B. Jacobs

Minutes from 28 Jan 2002 TAG teleconference (Wednesday, 30 January)
[whenToUseGet-7] GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms (Tuesday, 29 January)
[rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6] Algorithm for creating a URI from a QName in RDF Model? (Tuesday, 29 January)
[Minutes] 21 Jan 2002 TAG teleconference (Wednesday, 23 January)
[nsMediaType-3] Relationship between media types and namespaces? (Monday, 21 January)
[customMediaType-2] What commonality should there be among W3C media types? (Monday, 21 January)
[w3cMediaType-1] Should W3C WGs define their own media types? (Monday, 21 January)
[Minutes] 14 Jan 2002 TAG teleconference (Tuesday, 15 January)
[Minutes] 7 Jan 2002 TAG teleconference (Tuesday, 8 January)

Ian Graham

Re: Media types (Friday, 18 January)

Jacek Kopecky

Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Media types (Monday, 14 January)

Jeff Lowery

RE: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Monday, 7 January)
RE: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Friday, 4 January)
RE: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Thursday, 3 January)
RE: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Thursday, 3 January)
RE: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Thursday, 3 January)
RE: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Thursday, 3 January)
RE: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Thursday, 3 January)
RE: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Thursday, 3 January)
RE: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Wednesday, 2 January)

Jonathan Borden

Re: RDF Issue #rdfms-qname-uri-mapping (Tuesday, 22 January)
Re: RDF Issue #rdfms-qname-uri-mapping (Monday, 21 January)

Joseph Reagle

Re: Fwd: Three bits on MediaTypes and IANA (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: Fwd: Three bits on MediaTypes and IANA (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: Re: Fwd: Three bits on MediaTypes and IANA (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: Fwd: Three bits on MediaTypes and IANA (Tuesday, 15 January)
Fwd: Three bits on MediaTypes and IANA (Monday, 14 January)

Keith Moore

Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: Fwd: Three bits on MediaTypes and IANA (Wednesday, 16 January)

Larry Masinter

RE: Fwd: Three bits on MediaTypes and IANA (Friday, 18 January)
RE: Re: Fwd: Three bits on MediaTypes and IANA (Wednesday, 16 January)
IETF XML Mime mailing list archives & XML Protocol working group issues on MIME types (Wednesday, 16 January)

Lee Cole

RE: Re[2]: Is 'testability' a useful architectural constraint? (Monday, 7 January)
RE: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Thursday, 3 January)

Maarten Stolte

RE: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Wednesday, 2 January)

Mark Baker

QUERY (Wednesday, 30 January)
Re: Media types (Monday, 28 January)
Re: Issue request for the TAG: XForms (Friday, 18 January)
Re: Media types (Friday, 18 January)
Re: Media types (Friday, 18 January)
Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
XSLT and namespace dispatch (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Fwd: Three bits on MediaTypes and IANA (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Fwd: Three bits on MediaTypes and IANA (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Comments about http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Architecture#Conten t : is GET the only idempotent method (Friday, 11 January)
Re: Media types (Thursday, 10 January)
Re: Media types (Wednesday, 9 January)
Re: Media types (Wednesday, 9 January)
Media types (Wednesday, 9 January)
Re: "Homework" (was: [Minutes] 7 Jan 2002 TAG teleconference) (Wednesday, 9 January)

Mark Nottingham

Re: [nsMediaType-3] Principles and corner cases (Thursday, 31 January)
Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Thursday, 31 January)
Re: [whenToUseGet-7] GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms (Tuesday, 29 January)
TAG media type issues and XForms Last Call WD (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)

Martin Duerst

RE: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Sunday, 27 January)

Massimo Marchiori

Foundational Web Model(s) [was: Re: Comments about http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Architecture#Conten t : is GET the only idempotent method] (Friday, 11 January)

Micah Dubinko

Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be enco uraged...) (Thursday, 24 January)

Mike Dierken

RE: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Monday, 28 January)
RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: I ssue request for the TAG: XForms] (Wednesday, 23 January)
RE: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
RE: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
RE: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
Comments about http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Architecture#Conten t : proactive distribution (Thursday, 10 January)
Comments about http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Architecture#Conten t : is GET the only idempotent method (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: Media types (Thursday, 10 January)
RE: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Friday, 4 January)
RE: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Thursday, 3 January)

Mike Rajkowski

RE: Is 'testability' a useful architectural constraint? (Monday, 7 January)

Noah Mendelsohn

Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
RE: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)

Norman Walsh

Re: Media types (Monday, 28 January)
Re: Media types (Wednesday, 16 January)
Re: Media types (Monday, 14 January)
Re: Clark's commentary (Monday, 7 January)
Re: Clark's commentary (Monday, 7 January)
Re: Clark's commentary (Monday, 7 January)
Re: Clark's commentary (Monday, 7 January)
Re: Re[2]: Clark's commentary (Monday, 7 January)
Re: Clark's commentary (Monday, 7 January)
Re: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Monday, 7 January)

Paul Prescod

Re: QUERY (Thursday, 31 January)
Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should beencouraged...) (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Tuesday, 29 January)
Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Monday, 28 January)
Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Monday, 28 January)
Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Monday, 28 January)
Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should beenco uraged...) (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms] (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms] (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms] (Wednesday, 23 January)
Multiple namespaces (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)

Peter Pappamikail

Re: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Sunday, 6 January)
Re: Resource discovery: limits of URIs (Sunday, 6 January)

Roy T. Fielding

Re: Media types (Friday, 18 January)
Re: Media types (Friday, 18 January)
Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: "Homework" (was: [Minutes] 7 Jan 2002 TAG teleconference) (Wednesday, 9 January)
Re: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Thursday, 3 January)

Scott Penrose

Re: Media types (Friday, 25 January)
Re: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Thursday, 3 January)

Sean B. Palmer

Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)

Shakeel Mahate

Re: QUERY (Wednesday, 30 January)
Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Monday, 28 January)
Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Monday, 28 January)

Simon St.Laurent

Revised Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Thursday, 24 January)
Re: Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Wednesday, 23 January)
Internet-Draft: Media Feature - xmlns (Monday, 21 January)
Re: Media types (Friday, 18 January)
Re: Media types (Friday, 18 January)
RE: Media types (Friday, 18 January)
Re: Media types (Friday, 18 January)
RE: Media types (Friday, 18 January)
Re: Media types (Friday, 18 January)
Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)

Stephen van Egmond

Re: Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Thursday, 3 January)
Clark's commentary (Thursday, 3 January)

Steven Pemberton

Re: Media types (Friday, 25 January)

Tim Berners-Lee

Re: Issue? Supporting documentation for Issue resolution (Wednesday, 30 January)
Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Wednesday, 30 January)
Re: Background information on GET and XForms (was: GET should be encouraged...) (Monday, 28 January)
Re: Media types (Monday, 14 January)
Re: Comments about http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Architecture#Conten t : is GET the only idempotent method (Friday, 11 January)
Re: [Minutes] 7 Jan 2002 TAG teleconference (Thursday, 10 January)

Tim Bray

Re: Issue? Supporting documentation for Issue resolution (Wednesday, 30 January)
Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms] (Wednesday, 23 January)
Re: RDF Issue #rdfms-qname-uri-mapping (Tuesday, 22 January)
Re: [nsMediaType-3] Principles and corner cases (Monday, 21 January)
Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
Re: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
A suggestion for TAG output (Monday, 14 January)
Re: Media types (Monday, 14 January)
Comments on the architecture doc (Monday, 14 January)
Re: Media types (Wednesday, 9 January)
Re: Clark's commentary (Monday, 7 January)
Re: Clark's commentary (Monday, 7 January)
RE: Clark's commentary (Monday, 7 January)
Re: Clark's commentary (Monday, 7 January)
Is "simplicity" a useful architectural constraint? (Wednesday, 2 January)

Williams, Stuart

RE: Issue request for the TAG: XForms (Monday, 28 January)
RE: Media types (Thursday, 17 January)
RE: Media types (Tuesday, 15 January)
RE: Re[2]: Clark's commentary (Wednesday, 9 January)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2002 00:02:46 UTC