- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: 17 Jan 2002 21:16:10 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org, ietf-xml-mime@imc.org
On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 20:00, Mark Baker wrote: > > Therefore, it is not useful to send something as application/xml unless > > the sender specifically wishes it to be processed as generic XML. > > Fair enough. So what if we define "generic XML" to include dispatch > to processors keyed on namespace declarations? Wouldn't that make > it more semantically significant? I think I'm going to write up an initial draft using Content-features for an xmlns feature, so we should have some "semantic significance" in a MIME-specific context to discuss shortly. Hopefully I'll have it written by end of day tomorrow - this doesn't look especially tough, at least for an initial draft. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2002 20:12:24 UTC