- From: Edwin Ortega <ortegae@wns.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:23:11 -0800
- To: "Mike Dierken" <mike@dataconcert.com>, <www-tag@w3.org>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Dierken" <mike@dataconcert.com> To: <www-tag@w3.org>; <xml-dist-app@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:24 AM Subject: RE: Media types > > What are the things we are trying to describe here? > It looks to me like there are three concepts: > - syntax (its xml, or binary, or etc.) > - schema (the names and/or structures that are obeyed) > - model (the particular structural rules for this instance of content, when > schema has choices) > > I'm not as concerned about how these are represented, and where they show up > in a message, as I am about what we are trying to describe. Perhaps schema > and model are the same thing - perhaps there is a 'usage' slot, but this is > the level of question I'd like to see answered. > > Mike > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:44 AM > > To: paul@prescod.net > > Cc: www-tag@w3.org; xml-dist-app@w3.org > > Subject: Re: Media types > > > > > > > Consider this example from the XSLT specification: > > > > > > <html xsl:version="1.0" > > > xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" > > > xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/strict"> > > > <head> > > > <title>Expense Report Summary</title> > > > </head> > > > <body> > > > <p>Total Amount: <xsl:value-of > > select="expense-report/total"/></p> > > > </body> > > > </html> > > > > > > It's a perfect example. This document is logically XSLT, not HTML. > > > > In this example, I'd say it's both HTML and XSLT. However, > > HTML has the advantage in determining how that XSLT should be > > interpreted, since it's the container. > > > > For example, if HTML had an element called "do-not-process" > > that meant that any content whtin should not be dispatched to > > alternate processors, and that your XSLT was within this > > element, would you still say it was a stylesheet? > > > > I agree with TimBL when he says; > > > > "The significance of any nesting of one withing the other is > > to be defined by the nesting (outermost) specification [...]" > > > > (from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Jan/0081.html ) > > > > MB > > -- > > Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. > > Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com > > http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.com > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2002 12:26:08 UTC