- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 21:24:06 +0000
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
I like the general approach you suggest... At 11:49 AM 1/14/02 -0800, Tim Bray wrote: >There's another problem here and I don't yet see the good >solution. At what point does TAG work need to go on the >W3C Recommendation path? Maybe: whenever that "finding" becomes part of some working-group's recommendation-track specification, OR when the TAG itself feels that a finding should be independently progressed to recommendation? >Could we imagine batching up a year's worth of TAG findings >each year and taking it down the Recommendation path? That doesn't feel right to me. Better to have many small recommendations that a big monolith, I think. #g ------------ Graham Klyne GK@NineByNine.org
Received on Monday, 14 January 2002 17:18:13 UTC