- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:09:31 -0500
- To: <LMM@acm.org>, <w3c-policy@apps.ietf.org>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>, "Michael Mealling" <michaelm@rwhois.net>, "Ted Hardie" <hardie@equinix.com>, "Graham Klyne" <GK@acm.org>
On Wednesday 16 January 2002 11:21, Larry Masinter wrote: > There are some people who wish that IANA would keep > www.iana.org organized in a way that URLs of the > form "http://www.iana.org/.../media-types/..." could > be used as abstract URIs to identify MIME media types. Yes, and the reason I raise this is because (1) they state RFC1700 is out of date, the most normative registry that I can find right now is: http://www.iana.org/numbers.html which explicitly references http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/ (2) they are *already* doing it, to be really useful to me they just need a few tweaks. > However, there is no policy that IANA should do so; Nor any policy that they should not. > I, Graham Klyne, Ted Hardie and Michael Mealling did a > complete review of the IANA directory to see what > might be used to create URIs for IANA-registered protocol > elements, the results of which are at: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mealling-iana-urn-02.txt Does this apply to all registries at: http://www.iana.org/numbers.html In which case, what would the URN for the text/xml media type look like? > After considerable reflection and discussion with IANA, > it seemed inappropriate to try to change IANA's work practice > for organizing its published information merely to create URLs > that would be useful for other purposes. What were some of the issues? I might be willing to help out. (In what way would creating a registry akin to those already created for applications be a substantive change of work practice? For cooler stuff, do they keep the registry information in *any* structured data format?) >For the particular purpose of identifying a complete >media type designation including parameters and >parameter values, Eastlake's 'content-type' scheme in >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-eastlake-cturi-03.txt >seems just right. Do you (or anyone) then know the status of this with respect to that scheme being registered and the spec moving belong ietf-draft? -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2002 13:09:48 UTC