- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 08:33:31 -0800
- To: "David E. Cleary" <davec@progress.com>, www-tag@w3.org, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Chris Lilley wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 23, 2002, 10:26:39 PM, Paul wrote: > > PP> That's not the issue. This URL was generated with a form that does GET: > > PP> http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=David+Cleary > > PP> How would I generate that URL in a post-Form-GET world? > > With a single submit button and a null document instance, which would > then alert the XForms implementation to use GET instead of PUT or POST > as there is no message body to send. I'm not following. We're talking about whether XForms should support GET into the future. Are you presuming the answer is "yes" and suggesting a new syntax for triggering it? It was not my impression that there was a problem with the current syntax for triggering GET. It should just be un-deprecated and slightly cleaned up. Paul Prescod
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2002 11:34:58 UTC