- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:19:24 -0800
- To: www-tag@w3.org, ietf-xml-mime@imc.org, mura034@attglobal.net
At 04:11 PM 17/01/02 -0500, Mark Baker wrote: >Almost exactly what I was thinking. My strawman media type was >application/xmlns-dispatch+xml (not very catchy, I know). None of the arguments I've read here lead me to see this as a value-add over application/xml. It seems we think that applications should when processing XML resources dispatch based on namespaces... except when they can't, which I guess is the point of the worry about XSLT. Before launching the quest for a new media type, I think we need a clearer explanation of the use case where this is used and application/xml or anything/anything+xml isn't appropriate, and why. -Tim
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2002 18:25:11 UTC