- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: 17 Jan 2002 19:53:46 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Cc: Mike Dierken <mike@dataconcert.com>, www-tag@w3.org, ietf-xml-mime@imc.org
On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 18:32, Graham Klyne wrote: > Well, we now have ways to express other (non-primary) content types. > > E.g., per RFC 2912, RFC 2913, ... > > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="break" > Content-features: > (& (Type="text/plain") (Type="image/jpeg") (Type="audio/wav") ) Can we simply say (for an XHTML document also containing SVG, MathML, SMIL, and XLink): Content-Type: application/xhtml+xml Content-features: (& (xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml") (xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg") (xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML") (xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/SMIL20/") (xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink") ) If so, then we may already be out of the brush, though my reading of RFC 2913 suggests that we would need to add xmlns to RFC 3023's existing structure. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2002 18:49:40 UTC