- From: Peter Pappamikail <peter@pappamikail.net>
- Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 12:23:00 -0500 (EST)
- To: <www-tag@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 6 January 2002 12:33:14 UTC
Thanks for the replies to my initial comment and I'll certainly take a closer look at the Device Independent guidelines work. I like Mitch's idea of the volatility indicator and wonder how this might be tied into more consistent use of "validity" indicators in document metadata.... I think the heart of my concern is embedded in Roger's reply: "Many current problems with non-portable or non-persistent URIs could be attributed to poor server-side design. Perhaps better guidelines are needed for server developers..." I couldn't agree more!! I will be taking this issue up in the context of a European Commission supported project (see http://ag.idaprog.org/Indis35Prod/doc/312) starting this month that will, inter alia, be looking at the idea of persistent naming conventions for online government and public sector information and - hopefully - web services. I'll flag up related issues for anyone interested.... Peter
Received on Sunday, 6 January 2002 12:33:14 UTC