wai-xtech@w3.org from April 2008 by author

Aaron M Leventhal

• Re: DHTML Style Guide Document Updated (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: math role for ARIA - ARIA Subteam Public Meeting Minutes 2008-03-31 [DRAFT] (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: rangeslider, a "Tale of Two Thumbs" (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Style guide: tristatecheckbox (Monday, 14 April)
• RE: Style guide: tristatecheckbox (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Style guide: radio button (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Style guide: tristatecheckbox (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: let's discuss aria on #wai-aria (Friday, 11 April)
• RE: Style guide: rich text editor (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: math role for ARIA - ARIA Subteam Public Meeting Minutes 2008-03-31 [DRAFT] (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Style guide: rich text editor (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Style guide: rich text editor (Friday, 11 April)
• Style guide: wizard (Friday, 11 April)
• Style guide: rich text editor (Friday, 11 April)
• Style guide: radio button (Friday, 11 April)
• Style guide: combo box (Friday, 11 April)
• Style guide: tristatecheckbox (Friday, 11 April)
• Style guide: comments on alert (Friday, 11 April)
• Style guide: incremental find as you type in widgets (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: math role for ARIA - ARIA Subteam Public Meeting Minutes 2008-03-31 [DRAFT] (Friday, 11 April)
• Google Widget Toolkit 1.5 with ARIA support announced (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Thanks! Re: Runnable suggestion of ARIA in HTML5 document conformance integration (Tuesday, 1 April)
• Re: Thanks! Re: Runnable suggestion of ARIA in HTML5 document conformance integration (Tuesday, 1 April)

Al Gilman

• Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage (and even sometimes @aria-labelledby...) (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: [XHTML Access] redefining keys and ensuring user control over "activate" (yes tighten) (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: [XHTML Access] must "activate" be boolean? (not must, but should) (Thursday, 24 April)
• some reflections on @alt usage (Tuesday, 22 April)
• there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt] (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: math role for ARIA - ARIA Subteam Public Meeting Minutes 2008-03-31 [DRAFT] (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec. (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: Role attribute values (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Wednesday, 9 April)
• accessible custom hotkeys (Wednesday, 9 April)
• on-screen keyboards and Web page structure (Monday, 7 April)
• Re: Updated: Date Picker Widget (Tuesday, 1 April)

Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo

• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt] (Tuesday, 15 April)

Becky Gibson

• Updated auto complete proposal (Tuesday, 29 April)

Ben Boyle

• Re: several messages about alt (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: several messages about alt (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec. (Sunday, 13 April)

Bonner, Matt (IPG)

• RE: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage (Monday, 28 April)
• longdesc and ARIA Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Sunday, 27 April)
• Re: Opera, VoiceOver and alt (was: One more thought...) (Saturday, 26 April)
• Opera, VoiceOver and alt (was: One more thought...) (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• "Social engineering" Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value ... (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text. (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Unready and social engineering Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Unready and social engineering Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• process Re: omitting alt: closing an open ... (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• validity and other important things Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Chris Blouch

• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: Updated: Date Picker Widget (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: Updated: Date Picker Widget (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Updated: Date Picker Widget (Tuesday, 8 April)

Christophe Strobbe

• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text. (Monday, 14 April)

Dailey, David P.

• RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Thursday, 17 April)

Dan Connolly

• Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Wednesday, 9 April)

Dannii

• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)

Dave Singer

• Re: alt and authoring practices (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

David Bolter

• rangeslider, a "Tale of Two Thumbs" (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: let's discuss aria on #wai-aria (Saturday, 12 April)
• Re: let's discuss aria on #wai-aria (Friday, 11 April)
• let's discuss aria on #wai-aria (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: on-screen keyboards and Web page structure (Monday, 7 April)

David Carlisle

• Re: homogenized XML Entity Names and AT (Wednesday, 9 April)

David Poehlman

• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: img/alt summary attempt (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Style guide: tristatecheckbox (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Point of clarification in alt debate(s) (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Disparity between WCAG 2.0 and HTML5 editors definition of text alternative (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: process Re: omitting alt: closing an open ... (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: validity and other important things Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Style guide: rich text editor (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Style guide: rich text editor (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: on-screen keyboards and Web page structure (Monday, 7 April)

Diego La Monica (IWA/HWG)

• Re: Style guide: rich text editor (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Style guide: tristatecheckbox (Friday, 11 April)

Evans, Donald

• DHTML Style Guide Document Updated (Friday, 25 April)
• RE: Style guide: combo box (Friday, 11 April)
• DHTML Style Guide Updated (Tuesday, 8 April)
• DHTML Style Guide Meeting Tomorrow April 8 at 12 noon Eastern (Monday, 7 April)
• DHTML Style Guide Meeting today at 12 noon Eastern (Tuesday, 1 April)

Gez Lemon

• Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage (and even sometimes @aria-labelledby...) (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage (Monday, 28 April)

Gregory J. Rosmaita

• Re: [XHTML Access] redefining keys and ensuring user control over "activate" (yes tighten) (Wednesday, 30 April)
• [XHTML Access] activate boolean? & asserting user control (update) (Wednesday, 30 April)
• Image Annotation on the Semantic Web [Incubator Group Report] (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: longdesc and ARIA (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Integrate ARIA attributes into the XHTML namespace (Sunday, 27 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Integrate ARIA attributes into the XHTML namespace (Sunday, 27 April)
• Uncertainty Reasoning for the World Wide Web (Wednesday, 23 April)
• what's in a name? Common Web Language Report (Wednesday, 23 April)
• [XHTML Access] redefining keys and ensuring user control over "activate" (Monday, 14 April)
• [XHTML Access] must "activate" be boolean? (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Wednesday, 9 April)
• homogenized XML Entity Names and AT (Wednesday, 9 April)

Harry Loots

• Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: PROPOSAL: Integrate ARIA attributes into the XHTML namespace (Saturday, 26 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Integrate ARIA attributes into the XHTML namespace (Saturday, 26 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Image Report feature in Validator.nu (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: several messages about alt (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: img/alt summary attempt (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: img/alt summary attempt (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] Unready and social engineering Re: several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Unready and social engineering Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: several messages about alt (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: several messages about alt (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Thursday, 10 April)
• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Thursday, 10 April)
• Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Re: Thanks! Re: Runnable suggestion of ARIA in HTML5 document conformance integration (Tuesday, 1 April)

Ian Hickson

• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Thursday, 17 April)
• Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt] (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt] (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt] (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text. (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text. (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec. (Saturday, 12 April)
• RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute (Thursday, 10 April)

Ivan Enderlin

• Re: Image Report feature in Validator.nu (Friday, 18 April)

James Graham

• Re: Collecting of data about alt usage (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• [Fwd: Collecting of data about alt usage] (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Thursday, 10 April)

Jan Richards

• Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt] (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Jim Allan

• RE: [XHTML Access] must "activate" be boolean? (Thursday, 17 April)

Jim Jewett

• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Thursday, 17 April)
• new variant proposal on alt=? issues (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Thursday, 17 April)
• alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt] (Tuesday, 15 April)
• img/alt summary attempt (Monday, 14 April)
• Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Wednesday, 9 April)
• Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Wednesday, 9 April)

John Foliot

• RE: more alt rant (Monday, 28 April)
• RE: some reflections on @alt usage (Sunday, 27 April)
• RE: PROPOSAL: Integrate ARIA attributes into the XHTML namespace (Friday, 25 April)
• RE: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Thursday, 17 April)
• More effective approaches? (was RE: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Is this an accurate reflection of where we stand today? (was RE: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft)) (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: The Philosophy of @alt (was [html4all] several messages about alt) (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• RE: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Saturday, 12 April)
• RE: Disparity between WCAG 2.0 and HTML5 editors definition of text alternative (Friday, 11 April)
• RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Jon Gunderson

• Re: [XHTML Access] redefining keys and ensuring user control over "activate" (yes tighten) (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: Discussing ARIA in HTML5 integration (Thursday, 10 April)

Joseph Scheuhammer

• Re: rangeslider, a "Tale of Two Thumbs" (Tuesday, 22 April)
• Style guide: request two agenda items. (Tuesday, 15 April)

Joshue O Connor

• Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage (and even sometimes @aria-labelledby...) (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: longdesc and ARIA (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: longdesc and ARIA Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Sunday, 27 April)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: Image Report feature in Validator.nu (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices and validation behaviour (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: [html4all] img/alt summary attempt (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: [html4all] Unready and social engineering Re: several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Julian Reschke

• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Saturday, 12 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Justin James

• RE: Point of clarification in alt debate(s) (Monday, 14 April)

Karl Dubost

• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec. (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec. (Monday, 14 April)

Katie Haritos-Shea

• RE: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Laura Carlson

• Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: [html4all] Image Report feature in Validator.nu (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: [html4all] On HTML WG process - was [Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools] (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: [html4all] Unready and social engineering Re: several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] Unready and social engineering Re: several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress (Friday, 11 April)

Laurens Holst

• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Saturday, 19 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt] (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: there are markup options [was: Re: img/alt summary attempt] (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec. (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: several messages relating to the alt="" attribute (Friday, 11 April)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: Unready and social engineering Re: [html4all] several messages about alt (Monday, 14 April)

Marghanita da Cruz

• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Saturday, 19 April)

Martin Atkins

• Re: several messages about alt (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)

Matt Morgan-May

• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Neil Soiffer

• Re: math role for ARIA - ARIA Subteam Public Meeting Minutes 2008-03-31 [DRAFT] (Friday, 18 April)

Peter Krantz

• Re: Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec. (Saturday, 12 April)

Philip TAYLOR

• Re: [html4all] Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec. (Saturday, 12 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: [html4all] New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Richard Schwerdtfeger

• Re: Fw: rangeslider, a "Tale of Two Thumbs" (Wednesday, 23 April)
• Re: he John Slatin Fund Accessibility Project – Volunteering (Thursday, 3 April)

Roland Merrick

• Re: [XHTML Access] must "activate" be boolean? (Thursday, 17 April)

Sailesh Panchang

• RE: rangeslider, a "Tale of Two Thumbs" (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Style guide: tristatecheckbox (Monday, 14 April)
• RE: Style guide: tristatecheckbox (Monday, 14 April)

Schnabel, Stefan

• RE: alt and authoring practices (Friday, 18 April)
• RE: Style guide: request two agenda items. (Wednesday, 16 April)
• RE: img/alt summary attempt (Tuesday, 15 April)

Shane McCarron

• Re: PROPOSAL: Integrate ARIA attributes into the XHTML namespace (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Integrate ARIA attributes into the XHTML namespace (Sunday, 27 April)
• Re: PROPOSAL: Integrate ARIA attributes into the XHTML namespace (Saturday, 26 April)
• PROPOSAL: Integrate ARIA attributes into the XHTML namespace (Friday, 25 April)
• Re: [XHTML Access] must "activate" be boolean? (Monday, 14 April)

Steven Faulkner

• Re: [html4all] some reflections on @alt usage (Monday, 28 April)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: some reflections on @alt usage (Thursday, 24 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Monday, 21 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Sunday, 20 April)
• Re: [html4all] Image Report feature in Validator.nu (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: Another summary of alt="" issues and why the spec says what it says (Friday, 18 April)
• Re: One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• One more thought about requiring the alt to add to the pile (Friday, 18 April)
• testing the theory that required alt = bad (Thursday, 17 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: alt and authoring practices (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: [html4all] Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• On HTML WG process - was [Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools] (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Wednesday, 16 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Request for review of alt and alt value for authoring or publishing tools (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: Propose adoption of the term "text alternative" (as defined in WCAG 2.0) in HTML5 (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Propose adoption of the term "text alternative" (as defined in WCAG 2.0) in HTML5 (Tuesday, 15 April)
• Re: On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking (Monday, 14 April)
• On HTML5 conformance and conformance checking (Monday, 14 April)
• Re: Point of clarification in alt debate(s) (Monday, 14 April)
• Point of clarification in alt debate(s) (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text. (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text. (Sunday, 13 April)
• Propose removal or modification of the "Rorschach inkblot test" example and accompanying text. (Sunday, 13 April)
• Re: let's discuss aria on #wai-aria (Saturday, 12 April)
• Propose removing "An image in an e-mail or document intended for a specific person who is known to be able to view images" from the HTML5 spec. (Saturday, 12 April)
• Re: Disparity between WCAG 2.0 and HTML5 editors definition of text alternative (Friday, 11 April)
• Disparity between WCAG 2.0 and HTML5 editors definition of text alternative (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: omitting alt: closing an open issue with a bound action item in progress (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• Re: New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)
• New issue: IMG section of HTML5 draft contradicts WCAG 1 & WCAG 2 (draft) (Friday, 11 April)

Victor Tsaran

• RE: Updated auto complete proposal (Wednesday, 30 April)
• RE: Style guide: rich text editor (Friday, 11 April)

William Loughborough

• more alt rant (Monday, 28 April)
• RE: Re: longdesc and ARIA (Monday, 28 April)

Wlodkowski, Thomas

• RE: rangeslider, a "Tale of Two Thumbs" (Thursday, 17 April)
• RE: Style guide: request two agenda items. (Tuesday, 15 April)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:58:36 UTC